Proteolysis rates in vivo were measured in Escherichia coli cultures during treatment with dihydrostreptomycin and under various other conditions. Dihydrostreptomycin treatment caused an increase in the proteolysis rate, compared to untreated controls. The proteolytic system in vivo responsible for the elevated proteolysis in the early stages of dihydrostreptomycin treatment, or that during canavanine and puromycin treatment, were not inhibited by addition of phenylniethanesulphonyl fluoride. This agent did inhibit proteolysis rates in cultures whose growth was inhibited by starvation, or had been completely stopped by dihydrostreptomycin. It seems, therefore, that the extremely high proteolysis rates in cultures at this stage of dihydrostreptomycin treatment were due to the action of two protease systems: the one concerned with the breakdown of abnormal proteins, and the other concerned with normal protein turnover and active during a non-specific decline of growth.The proteolytic rate at complete growth inhibition brought about by dihydrostreptomycin was intermediate between those induced by canavanine and puromycin at the same stage of treatment. This indicated a similar hierarchy in the extent and nature of abnormality in the proteins synthesised under these conditions. The relationship between the abnormality of proteins induced by dihydrostreptomycin and the importance of this in the antibiotic mechanism is discussed.Streptomycin was demonstrated to cause mistranslation during protein synthesis in vitro with synthetic [l] and natural messengers [2-41. Since in vitro, the misreading effect of streptomycin is effective at the level of codon-anticodon interaction [ 5 ] and is limited to certain bases [6], one can envisage that streptomycin-induced misreading could occur to cause both missense and nonsense. The misreading effect was used to account for the phenotypic suppression in vivo of both nonsense and missense mutations in streptomycin-resistant and streptomycinsensitive Escherichia coli strains treated with streptomycin 17-12]. Misreading has been proposed as effective in the growth inhibitory effect of streptomycin, but this hypothesis has been contested [S]. On the other hand, indications of misreading effects of streptomycin being related to the growth inhibitory effects are supported by the demonstration of growth of mutants by phenotypic suppression at low streptomycin concentrations, whereas at higher streptomycin concentrations there is non-growth of such mutants [ l l -121. Further, a correlation has been found between the extent of misreading in vitro caused by streptomycin, paramomycin or ethanol [ 1,2,13] and the response of strains sensitive, resistant or dependent on streptomycin to these agents in vivo [ 141. This is particularly pertinent for streptomycindependent strains which are resistant to growth inhibition in the presence of streptomycin or paramomycin, but sensitive to their combined presence. Also, in a protein-synthesising system in vitro, the polypeptides produced were smaller ...