1995
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.51.3890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of spatiotemporal signals of complex systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of nonzero eigenvalues of the matrix C ij represents the number of orthogonal components that can express the recorded 18-dimensional vector. The optimality of the K-L method reduces the amount of information about a signal down to a reasonable number of independent eigenvalues that represent important characteristic features of the signal (Broomhead and King 1986;Uhl et al 1995;Haken 1996). The first principal eigenvalue is taken to be along the direction with the maximum variance.…”
Section: Determining the Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of nonzero eigenvalues of the matrix C ij represents the number of orthogonal components that can express the recorded 18-dimensional vector. The optimality of the K-L method reduces the amount of information about a signal down to a reasonable number of independent eigenvalues that represent important characteristic features of the signal (Broomhead and King 1986;Uhl et al 1995;Haken 1996). The first principal eigenvalue is taken to be along the direction with the maximum variance.…”
Section: Determining the Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the great variety of methods that have been developed, they generally suffer from significant limitations because they adopt (sometimes explicitly but often implicitly) ad hoc procedures predicated on characteristics of the data that are often not true, such as Gaussianity and linearity, or unsupported, such as the independence of the signal sources. Other procedures based on very specific models of dynamical systems (such as least-squared with the assumption that a system is near a critical point [28, 29]) lack the generality that enables their use in other applications. These deficiencies become more acute as the capabilities of the instrumentation increases and the measurements become more sensitive to complex and subtle spatio-temporal variations in the observed physical systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis problem presented by rsFMRI data is, in some sense, a classic example of a data analysis problem that has become ubiquitous with the advancement of modern scientific instruments and been addressed by a range of methods (Ghil et al, 2002; Christakos, 1991; Plis et al, 2007; Min & Wynter, 2011; Wallace, Smith, & Bretherton, 1992; Lamus, Haemaelaeinen, Temereanca, Brown, & Purdon, 2012; Bijma, de Munck, & Heethaar, 2005; Plaut & Vautard, 1994; Uhl, Friedrich, & Haken, 1995, 1993). These data consist of high spatial and temporal resolution noisy volumes within which non-linear and non-Gaussian processes produce complicated signal fluctuations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%