2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.07.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of solid concentration distribution in dense solid–liquid stirred tanks by electrical resistance tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the solids concentration is not homogeneous across either the radial or axial planes in a stirred‐tank system. Using ERT, Carletti et al evaluated a solid‐liquid system by measuring the spatial concentration of the dispersed phase (solid). They concluded that the homogeneity of the system decreased with higher solid loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the solids concentration is not homogeneous across either the radial or axial planes in a stirred‐tank system. Using ERT, Carletti et al evaluated a solid‐liquid system by measuring the spatial concentration of the dispersed phase (solid). They concluded that the homogeneity of the system decreased with higher solid loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hosseini et al used an Electrical Resistance Tomography (ERT) technique to measure solid concentration distributions and investigate how the impeller type, impeller speed, impeller off‐bottom clearance, and particle size affected mixing efficiency. Carletti et al also used ERT to investigate the spatial solids distribution in a stirred tank and they proposed a method to evaluate the solids distribution under different working conditions and geometrical set‐up. Tahvildarian et al and Harrison et al used ERT to study how the working condition, particle size, and particle concentration affected the solids concentration homogeneity in a stirred tank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, in a system containing one conductive continuous phase and one nonconductive dispersed phase, the local volume fraction of the nonconductive material is estimated from the conductivity of the mixture compared with the conductivity of the reference obtained with the pure continuous phase, as in the case of solid particles suspended in a stirred liquid. [ 23 ] The conversion is often based on the simplified Maxwell equation: α=2()CLCmc2CL+Cmc where C L is the dimensionless conductivity of continuous phases, equal to one; and C mc is the dimensionless conductivity of the mixture. In the case of the dialyzer, the conversion cannot be applied directly since the dimensionless conductivity of the continuous phase, which is usually measured when the reference condition is recorded, cannot be measured without the fibres bundle in the liquid.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%