2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70353-4_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Skeletal Shape Trajectories for Person Re-Identification

Abstract: In this paper, we are interested in people re-identification using skeleton information provided by a consumer RGB-D sensor. We perform the modelling and the analysis of human motion by focusing on 3D human joints given by skeletons. In fact, the motion dynamic is modeled by projecting skeleton information on Grassmann manifold. Moreover, in order to define the identity of a test trajectory, we compare it against a labeled trajectory database while using an unsupervised similarity assessment procedure. Indeed,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 shows that the proposed method outperforms the work presented in [8] with value equals to 90.90% vs. 82% at rank 4 and it reaches a value of 100% at rank 5, whereas the work of [8] reaches the value of 100% only at rank 7. However, the work of [8] outperforms the proposed method on rank 1 with value equals to 45.45% vs. 36.36%. Thus, the proposed method records much higher matching rates than the work of [8] and for some other cases the work of [8] outperforms the proposed method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6 shows that the proposed method outperforms the work presented in [8] with value equals to 90.90% vs. 82% at rank 4 and it reaches a value of 100% at rank 5, whereas the work of [8] reaches the value of 100% only at rank 7. However, the work of [8] outperforms the proposed method on rank 1 with value equals to 45.45% vs. 36.36%. Thus, the proposed method records much higher matching rates than the work of [8] and for some other cases the work of [8] outperforms the proposed method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Fig. 6 shows that the proposed method outperforms the work presented in [8] with value equals to 90.90% vs. 82% at rank 4 and it reaches a value of 100% at rank 5, whereas the work of [8] reaches the value of 100% only at rank 7. However, the work of [8] outperforms the proposed method on rank 1 with value equals to 45.45% vs. 36.36%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations