2023
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2023.3237178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Single-Event Upsets and Transients in 22 nm Fully Depleted Silicon-On-Insulator Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proven that the soft error rate (SER) with a 28 nm Ultra-Thin Body and BOX (UTBB) is almost two orders of magnitude lower than with similar 28 nm bulk technology [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Previous studies have focused on the Single-Event Upset (SEU) characteristics, total-dose ionizing responses, and simulations of FDSOI technology [15][16][17][18][19]. However, it was found that soft errors resulting from SETs in combinational logic circuits surpassed those resulting from SEUs in storage circuits, such as flip-flops and SRAM, when the combinational logic circuit operates at a high frequency [6,[20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proven that the soft error rate (SER) with a 28 nm Ultra-Thin Body and BOX (UTBB) is almost two orders of magnitude lower than with similar 28 nm bulk technology [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Previous studies have focused on the Single-Event Upset (SEU) characteristics, total-dose ionizing responses, and simulations of FDSOI technology [15][16][17][18][19]. However, it was found that soft errors resulting from SETs in combinational logic circuits surpassed those resulting from SEUs in storage circuits, such as flip-flops and SRAM, when the combinational logic circuit operates at a high frequency [6,[20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%