2000
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(20000801)21:14<2947::aid-elps2947>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of similarity of electrophoretic patterns in mRNA differential display

Abstract: We present a novel method of statistical analysis for the comparison of electrophoretic data. The method is based on the squared Euclidian distance of normalized signal data vectors of electrophoretic lanes. The differences in the electrophoretic patterns are evaluated by a statistical test based on Hubert's statistics which measures the significance of the signal grouping. We demonstrate the validity and applicability of the method in a large data set derived from automated fluorescent mRNA differential displ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All differentially displayed fragments in these highly similar samples within a group are assumed to be linked to the experimental infection. We have shown earlier that lane data within these theoretically similar groups show statistical cohesion [6]. In the current study, there were 624 groups of three lanes producing 1872 lane pairs to be analyzed on the fragment-by-fragment basis with respect to the presence or absence of differentially displayed fragments.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Electropherogramsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All differentially displayed fragments in these highly similar samples within a group are assumed to be linked to the experimental infection. We have shown earlier that lane data within these theoretically similar groups show statistical cohesion [6]. In the current study, there were 624 groups of three lanes producing 1872 lane pairs to be analyzed on the fragment-by-fragment basis with respect to the presence or absence of differentially displayed fragments.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Electropherogramsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The requirement of similar background is considered by dividing the distance by the average difference of the environment of other L* -1 matched peak pairs. Here, the total distance D* is used in the place of the Euclidian distance, previously employed in the analysis of electrophoretic data on a lane-by-lane basis [6]. In statistical terms, the observed value of S k is used to test whether the distance of p* k is an outlier in p*.…”
Section: Dissimilarity Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the mispriming and the rest of the process can be rendered reproducible enough, even small changes in mRNA expression may be detected reliably. We have shown previously by the similarity analysis of numerical DD-PCR data [20] that this goal can probably be achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Allelic frequency can be confirmed by analyzing the corresponding fragments from the denaturing DD-PCR-gel. It is evident that this kind of approach is best solved by automated analysis of numerical DD-PCR data [20,21] produced in an automated multicapillary sequencer. A modern 384-capillary multicolor electrophoretic device can analyze several million DD-PCR fragments in 24 h. The 2880 electrophoretic samples of the current study could be analyzed in 3 h.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%