1995
DOI: 10.1002/pen.760351904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of shrinkage by dual kriging for filled and unfilled polypropylene molded parts

Abstract: This paper examines, through holding pressure, packing time, melt temperature, mold temperature and distance from the gate, the effect of molding conditins on the shrinkage of polypropylene and 40% calcium carbonate (CaCO3) filled polypropylene. The shrinkage longitudinal and transvrse to the flow direction were determined using a 127 × 76 × 4 mm thick plaque with a film gate. Marks were made ont he mold cavity to measure shrinkage at various distances from the gate. The results show that holding pressure and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, the time for the melt to stay above and within the phasechange temperature range is sufficient, and more time is given for the growth of spherulites from the melt. [45] Thus, both crystallinity and shrinkage (due to crystallization) are high, and the latter in turn results in the TCR, which should be responsible for the deviation between simulations and measurements. Table 3 shows the comparison of the experimental cooling rates (estimated according to ref [46] .)…”
Section: Experimental Results and Validationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the time for the melt to stay above and within the phasechange temperature range is sufficient, and more time is given for the growth of spherulites from the melt. [45] Thus, both crystallinity and shrinkage (due to crystallization) are high, and the latter in turn results in the TCR, which should be responsible for the deviation between simulations and measurements. Table 3 shows the comparison of the experimental cooling rates (estimated according to ref [46] .)…”
Section: Experimental Results and Validationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were stored at 23 °C for a week before the measurements. The formula of the shrinkage in percentage is given as follows: Shrinkage% = 100%× true(LL0true)/L0 where L 0 is the length measured in the mold cavity and L is the length of the specimen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were stored at 23 8C for a week before the measurements. The formula of the shrinkage in percentage is given as follows 25 :…”
Section: Shrinkage Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local and anisotropic shrinkage have been measured at the surface of injection molded parts mostly by optical methods. Jansen et al [1] and Schift et al [3] used microscopes, Régnier and Trotignon [2] employed a camera, Liao et al [4] a scanner and finally, Mamat et al [5] employed a profile projector for this purpose. Shrinkage in the thickness direction has also been measured using mechanical means such as micrometers [6] and coordinate measuring machines [7,8], which are more appropriate for this type of measurements.…”
Section: Injection Molding Shrinkagementioning
confidence: 99%