Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID‐19: A first approach

Cerda‐Cosme, Roxana; Méndez, Eva

doi:10.1002/asi.24716

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(44 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is a simple and universal format that can be easily read and edited by both humans and computer programs. The reference by highlights the prevalence of TXT files in research data, indicating its widespread use in scientific papers [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficiency Analysis of Compression Software (WINRAR and 7-Zip) Across Diverse Data Types on Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10

Rakha Maulana,

Bahteramon Bintang Sanjaya Manurung,

Nathanael Berliano Novanka Putra

et al. 2023

Info Sains

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the performance and efficiency of two widely used compression software, WINRAR and 7-Zip, across various data types. The study focuses on evaluating their effectiveness on different operating systems, specifically Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10. The analysis encompasses considerations such as compression ratios, resource utilization, and processing times. WINRAR and 7-Zip are examined in diverse scenarios, including the compression of text files (.txt), image files (.png), audio files (.flac), and video files (.mp4). The study reveals notable variations in compression outcomes influenced by intrinsic complexities of each file format. Moreover, the investigation extends beyond the initially studied operating systems, suggesting potential applications on other platforms like Kali Linux. The findings contribute insights into the nuanced performance of compression software across varied data types and operating environments, facilitating informed decision-making for users seeking optimal compression solutions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficiency Analysis of Compression Software (WINRAR and 7-Zip) Across Diverse Data Types on Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10

Rakha Maulana,

Bahteramon Bintang Sanjaya Manurung,

Nathanael Berliano Novanka Putra

et al. 2023

Info Sains

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…No one is casting doubt on the advantages of open access to results derived from research, but there are still barriers to overcome in terms of the participation of researchers and their reticence toward sharing their data. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the way in which collaborative and shared scientific communication accelerated advances in the search for treatments for the virus, but there is still ground to be gained with regard to the participation and acknowledgement of researchers who adopt open science practices [ 8 , 9 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, the active debate on how to appropriately evaluate researchers and research groups has been promoted by the academic world [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], and evaluation agencies themselves (ANECA, in Spain) display an active interest in reflecting on said aspects.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Habits and perceptions regarding open science by researchers from Spanish institutions

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article describes the results of the online survey on open science (OS) carried out on researchers affiliated with universities and Spanish research centres and focused on open access to scientific publications, the publication process, the management of research data and the review of open articles. The main objective was to identify the perception and habits of researchers with regard to practices closely linked to open science and the scientific value added is that offers an in-depth picture of researchers as one of the main actors to whom this transformation and implementation of open science will fall. It focuses on the different aspects of OS: open access, open data, publication process and open review in order to identify habits and perceptions. This is to make possible an implementation of the OS movement. The survey was carried out among researchers who had published in the years 2020–2021, according to data obtained from WoS. It was emailed to a total of 8,188 researchers and obtained a total of 666 responses, of which 554 were complete, the rest being forms with some questions unanswered. The main results showed that open access still requires the diffusion of practices and services provided by the institution, as well as training (library or equivalent service) and institutional support from the competent authorities (vice rectors or equivalent) in specific aspects such as data management. In the case of data, around 50% of respondents stated they had stored data in a repository, and of all the options, the most frequently given was that of an institutional repository, followed by a discipline repository. Among the main reasons for doing this, we found transparency, visibility of data and the ability to validate results. For those who stated they had never stored data, the most frequent reasons for not having done so were privacy and confidentiality, the lack of a mandated data policy or a lack of knowledge of how to do it. In terms of open peer review, participants mentioned a certain reticence to the opening of evaluations due to potential conflicts of interest that may arise or because lower-quality content might be accepted in order to avoid conflicts. In addition, the hierarchical structure of senior researcher versus junior researcher might affect reviews. The main conclusions indicate a need for persuasion of OA to take place; APCs are an economic barrier rather than the main criterion for journal selection; OPR practices may seem innovative and emerging; scientific and evaluation policies seem to have a clear effect on the behaviour of researchers; researchers state that they share research data more for reasons of persuasion than out of obligation. Researchers do question the pathways or difficulties that may arise on a day-to-day basis and seem aware that we are undergoing change, where academic evaluation or policies related to open science, its implementation and habits among researchers may change. In this sense, more and better support is needed on the part of institutions and faculty support services.

show abstract

“…La mayoría de estos estudios han obtenido sus datos o bien de forma agregada (buscando por palabras claves, por ejemplo, Cerda-Cosme y Méndez, 2022;López-López et al, 2020) o bien a partir del perfil de clasificación de las revistas en distintas bases de datos (por ejemplo, Gregorio-Chaviano et al, 2022). Estas aproximaciones resultan útiles para dibujar mapas genéricos sobre investigación en COVID-19 (por ejemplo, en el contexto médico), sobre elementos muy concretos (teletrabajo, diabetes, ciencias ambientales) o para establecer estadística descriptiva (financiación, citaciones y otros indicadores altmétricos).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

La investigación en periodismo y covid-19 en España: mayor impacto académico en citas, aproximaciones metodológicas clásicas e importancia temática de la desinformación

Salvador-Mata

Cortiñas-Rovira

Herrero-Solana

2023

RLCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducción. Se analiza el impacto y el modo en el que la disciplina académica del periodismo investigó sobre el Covid-19 y su repercusión metodológica, temática y de fuentes. Metodología. Se obtiene un universo de 124 artículos mediante agrupación algorítmica por InCites (micro tópico periodismo, afiliación española y palabra clave covid-19). Se procede a un análisis bibliométrico, acompañado por un análisis de contenido cualitativo para generar códigos comunes en metodología, temática y uso de fuentes. Se realizan análisis cuantitativos de co-ocurrencia y correlaciones descriptivas entre las tres variables estudiadas y sus citas. Resultados. Los artículos sobre covid-19 recibieron cinco veces más citas que el resto, y la mayoría (86%) se concentran en los primeros artículos. Se emplearon mayormente metodologías clásicas (49% análisis de contenido, 16% encuestas). La revisión bibliográfica (13 citas/artículo) y las técnicas avanzadas de análisis automático (10,75 citas/artículo) son las que reciben más citas. La temática principal es la desinformación (26%, 11,07 citas/artículo) y la fuente más común la prensa (27%, 6,15 citas/artículo), si bien generan más impacto las redes sociales (22%, 9,12 citas/artículo) y los fact-checkers (10%, 8,50 citas/artículo). Discusión y Conclusiones. Los artículos que primero se publicaron generaron más citas. Se identificó un uso recurrente de estrategias clásicas (análisis de contenido, prensa) si bien son las aproximaciones ligeramente más novedosas (técnicas avanzadas de análisis automático) las que producen más citas. La desinformación deviene uno de los temas claves. Las metodologías y temáticas poco comunes no reciben prácticamente citaciones.

show abstract

Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID‐19: A first approach

Cited by 3 publications

References 28 publications

Efficiency Analysis of Compression Software (WINRAR and 7-Zip) Across Diverse Data Types on Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10

Efficiency Analysis of Compression Software (WINRAR and 7-Zip) Across Diverse Data Types on Windows 11 and Ubuntu 23.10

Habits and perceptions regarding open science by researchers from Spanish institutions

La investigación en periodismo y covid-19 en España: mayor impacto académico en citas, aproximaciones metodológicas clásicas e importancia temática de la desinformación

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About