2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of serviceability limit state of GFRP prestressed concrete beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anticorrosion properties are particularly relevant in aggressive environments, for example, bridge structures [6]. Strength properties could be used even more efficiently and economically by prestressing the FRP material [7,8]. However, the effectiveness of strengthening can be compromised by loss of composite action, which can be delayed by using the additional anchorage [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anticorrosion properties are particularly relevant in aggressive environments, for example, bridge structures [6]. Strength properties could be used even more efficiently and economically by prestressing the FRP material [7,8]. However, the effectiveness of strengthening can be compromised by loss of composite action, which can be delayed by using the additional anchorage [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second member in Eq. 1.54 is the secondary bending moment due to prestress corresponding to the deflection δ = 0, elsewhere (Atutis et al 2015, Atutis, 2018 so-called decompression moment. where ξ -load adding coefficient (four point bending case: ξ = 1/8 -(L s / L) 2 / 6).…”
Section: Review Of Deflection Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) into Eq. (7) is defined as the flexural strength (M n ) of the cross section, and two-thirds of this flexural strength was defined as the flexural moment at the service loads (M service ) (Gagely and Lutz 1968;Frosch 1999;Atutis et al 2015). In the following discussions, only the Class C sections were considered, excluding the Class U and T sections.…”
Section: It -Inverted T T -T Shapementioning
confidence: 99%