2008
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200800119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of selected stilbenes in Polygonum cuspidatum by HPLC coupled with CoulArray detection

Abstract: The roots of three varieties of Polygonum cuspidatum were analyzed for resveratrol and its analogs. The powder of the dried roots was extracted with aqueous ethanol (60% v/v) and the extracts obtained were analyzed using RP HPLC with coulometric detection. A simple HPLC method with a multichannel CoulArray detector was developed for the determination of four stilbenes: resveratrol, its glucoside piceid, piceatannol, and its glucoside astringin. Analyses were carried out on a LiChrospher C18 (125 x 4.6 mm id, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(16 reference statements)
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the amount of piceatannol and resveratrol found in the extracts, it was verified that the extracts obtained using ethanol showed small differences of stilbenes content, whereas in the case of extracts that were obtained with acetone, the amount of resveratrol was significantly higher than the amount of piceatannol. These results corroborate other previous studies, in which the amount of resveratrol was higher than the amount of piceatannol found in plants [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Some authors showed that the amount of resveratrol in grapes was approximately four times higher than that of piceatannol (0.78 μg/g and 3.18 μg/g, respectively) [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…When comparing the amount of piceatannol and resveratrol found in the extracts, it was verified that the extracts obtained using ethanol showed small differences of stilbenes content, whereas in the case of extracts that were obtained with acetone, the amount of resveratrol was significantly higher than the amount of piceatannol. These results corroborate other previous studies, in which the amount of resveratrol was higher than the amount of piceatannol found in plants [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Some authors showed that the amount of resveratrol in grapes was approximately four times higher than that of piceatannol (0.78 μg/g and 3.18 μg/g, respectively) [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The result that stilbenes and anthraquinones are major secondary metabolites of RJ is consistent with the previous data [23]. The contents of polydatin and resveratrol in dried rhizomes of RJ was similar to those of a previous report [24]. However, phenylpropanoid glucosides were not determined in RS by our analytical method, while there is a report that these compounds were detected in RS by LC-MS analysis [23].…”
Section: Hplc-dad Profiles Of Reynoutria Plantssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There is even a report that seems to have treated R. japonica and R. forbesii as the same species [17]. Despite their outer morphological characteristics, and the fact that the genetic diversity or chemical constituents of some specimens have been previously reported, there are no previous reports of an anatomical or phytochemical study that can be applied to the decree of the botanical origin of the Reynoutria species [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Furthermore, it is very hard to discriminate crude drugs from these species precisely because they are usually sold as chopped rhizomes in the markets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the calibration curves of selected compounds (trans-resveratrol, polydatin, (−)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin), the contents of individual compounds were determined in all the extracts used in this study. Among stilbenes, trans-resveratrol has been the most widely studied for its effect on human health [24], and catechins were determined in spring sprouts of Fallopia species [25]. The highest contents of all investigated phenolic compounds were found in rhizomes (Figure 1A), whereas in the flowers (Figure 1B), the contents were considerably lower or not detectable at all.…”
Section: Identification and Quantification Of Phenolic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%