2008
DOI: 10.1134/s0016793208030134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of seismoionospheric disturbances at the Chain of Japanese stations for vertical sounding of the ionosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The epicentres are located at a distance 90-500 km from Athens. However, it was found that there is a limitation in distance after which we could not find any reliable ionospheric anomalies (Korsunova and Khegai, 2008;Perrone et al, 2010). In our case, we did not analyse the more distant EQs from the Athens ionosonde station, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The epicentres are located at a distance 90-500 km from Athens. However, it was found that there is a limitation in distance after which we could not find any reliable ionospheric anomalies (Korsunova and Khegai, 2008;Perrone et al, 2010). In our case, we did not analyse the more distant EQs from the Athens ionosonde station, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Korsunova and Khegai (2008) and Perrone et al (2010), the deviations in h Es, fbEs and foF2 ionospheric parameters should simultaneously satisfy the ionospheric anomaly selection criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Korsunova and Khegai (2008) the deviations in three h Es, fbEs, and foF2 ionospheric parameters should simultaneously satisfy the precursor selection criteria. The occurrence of abnormally high Es layer for 2-3 h is considered as a necessary condition for identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any attempt to derive quantitative relationships for the seismo-ionospheric coupling should be considered an important step towards better understanding of the physical mechanisms driving such phenomena. An approach showing remarkable results was proposed by Korsunova and Khegai [41,42] and successively applied by Perrone et al [43,44], according to which a dense Es layer can be produced over the preparation zone of future EQs at 120-140 km height. The preparation zone is defined by the Dobrovolsky formula [45], ρ ≤ 10 0.43M , where M is the magnitude of the EQ and ρ is the radius (in km) of the supposed circular preparation zone, centered in the epicentral location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preparation zone is defined by the Dobrovolsky formula [45], ρ ≤ 10 0.43M , where M is the magnitude of the EQ and ρ is the radius (in km) of the supposed circular preparation zone, centered in the epicentral location. A multi-parametric approach considering quasi-simultaneous variations in three parameters of the Es and regular F2 layers is applied [42][43][44]46]. This approach relates the lead time ∆T for a future EQ event, counted from the moment of the observed ionospheric anomaly occurrence, with the magnitude of the EQ and the distance of its epicenter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%