2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/45
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Seeing-Induced Polarization Cross-Talk and Modulation Scheme Performance

Abstract: We analyze the generation of polarization cross-talk in Stokes polarimeters by atmospheric seeing, and its effects on the noise statistics of spectro-polarimetric measurements for both single-beam and dual-beam instruments. We investigate the time evolution of seeing-induced correlations between different states of one modulation cycle, and compare the response to these correlations of two popular polarization modulation schemes in a dual-beam system. Extension of the formalism to encompass an arbitrary number… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling the fringes by a superposition of sine curves of various amplitudes and frequencies requires little computing time when compared to more involved approaches using wavelet analysis (Rojo & Harrington 2006) or 2D pattern recognition (Casini et al 2012). Drawbacks are the danger of removing or modifying an actual signal, that is a spectral line.…”
Section: Data Description and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling the fringes by a superposition of sine curves of various amplitudes and frequencies requires little computing time when compared to more involved approaches using wavelet analysis (Rojo & Harrington 2006) or 2D pattern recognition (Casini et al 2012). Drawbacks are the danger of removing or modifying an actual signal, that is a spectral line.…”
Section: Data Description and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such variations, along with residual image motion of instrumental origin, may cause spurious polarization signals [I → Q, U , and V crosstalk] if one analyzes the modulated beam with a single linear polarizer. This problem is largely overcome if one simultaneously analyzes both s-and p-polarizations, and combines the results appropriately in a "dual-beam" polarimeter (Lites, 1987;Judge et al, 2004;Sankarasubramanian et al, 2006;Gosain, 2007;Casini, de Wijn, and Judge, 2012). The advantages of dual-beam polarimetry in the presence of rapid seeing fluctuations have been demonstrated by several ground-based polarimeters including the ASP, and by the IMaX balloon-borne instrument (Martínez Pillet et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Modified Savart Plate Polarization Analyzermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been shown using numerical simulations 184 and measurements 39 that seeing-induced crosstalk considerably reduces, down to few times 0.01%, for modulation frequencies above 100 Hz, and drops below the detection limit in the kHz regime. 185 As a consequence of the above, instrumental developments using a temporal modulation scheme aim for a high modulation frequency to reduce jitter and seeing-induced artifacts. Most of the designs employ standard Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs) or Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) architectures in a synchronous readout approach.…”
Section: Temporal Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%