2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2020
DOI: 10.1109/aero47225.2020.9172431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Sample Acquisition Dynamics Using Discrete Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas physics engine applications involve both individual objects and particle assemblages, DEM has primarily focused on modeling mechanical behavior of particle assemblages since it was introduced (Cundall and Strack, 1979). Modern DEM applications include particle transportation in mining (Pezo et al, 2015), particle compaction in material science (Martin et al, 2003), fertilizer spreading in agriculture (Coetzee and Lombard, 2011), soil-tool interaction (Asaf et al, 2007;Catanoso et al, 2020), particle mixer and grinder machinery (Alian et al, 2015;Cleary, 2015), rocky slopes in geoengineering (Chuhan et al, 1997), dynamic analysis of infrastructures (Çaktı et al, 2016;Mehrotra and DeJong, 2017;Papantonopoulos et al, 2002), and fault ruptures Bray, 2018, 2022;Chiama et al, 2023).…”
Section: Physics Engine Versus Discrete Element Methods (Dem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas physics engine applications involve both individual objects and particle assemblages, DEM has primarily focused on modeling mechanical behavior of particle assemblages since it was introduced (Cundall and Strack, 1979). Modern DEM applications include particle transportation in mining (Pezo et al, 2015), particle compaction in material science (Martin et al, 2003), fertilizer spreading in agriculture (Coetzee and Lombard, 2011), soil-tool interaction (Asaf et al, 2007;Catanoso et al, 2020), particle mixer and grinder machinery (Alian et al, 2015;Cleary, 2015), rocky slopes in geoengineering (Chuhan et al, 1997), dynamic analysis of infrastructures (Çaktı et al, 2016;Mehrotra and DeJong, 2017;Papantonopoulos et al, 2002), and fault ruptures Bray, 2018, 2022;Chiama et al, 2023).…”
Section: Physics Engine Versus Discrete Element Methods (Dem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle sizes in all of the specimens ranged in radius from 12 to 18 mm, where particles from the plume are 0.6-15 μm (Southworth et al 2019). The most significant effect from using larger particles is a higher variation in surface stiffness, particularly post-breakage (Catanoso et al 2020). Because internal loads in granular materials are carried through force chains, with larger particles, these force chains are farther away from each other, leading to a lower likelihood of the footpad landing on an average grouping of these force chains.…”
Section: Generating Numerical Specimens For Modeling the Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrete element methods (DEMs) have been utilized for extraterrestrial ice previously, often for modeling sample acquisition (Catanoso et al 2020;Riccobono et al 2021). Extraterrestrial applications beyond ice have used DEMs as well (Karapiperis et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a few other relevant research works, e.g., refs. [8][9][10][11][12] and our own recent article [13], beyond these studies, the literature on sampling system investigation using DEM remains limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%