2021
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000007578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Sagittal Position Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Across the Four Different Types of Plating Systems

Abstract: The authors analyzed the three-dimensional postoperative condylar position change across the plating systems. This retrospective study was conducted with the patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with setback surgery. The condylar change was analyzed from preoperative cone-beam computed tomography to postoperative 1 month (T1) and postoperative 6 months (T2) using superimposition software, automatically merging based on the anterior cranial base. The condylar changes during T1 and T2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ku et al, 2021 41 recently examined condylar position change after mandibular setback OS across 4 different plates and did not discuss CR or shape changes, instead focusing on condylar position changes that showed after 12 months and the current study agrees with the results of Ku and colleagues, as well as Park et al, 42 who affirmed that we still need more evidence on CR related with different plating systems using 3-dimensional analysis after different OS and DO devices. Furthermore, these findings were recently reaffirmed by Nayansi et al, 2023, 43 who examined distinct plating results at just setback OS in class III patients and, therefore, for CR outcomes in class II patients, particularly those who underwent BSSO with different fixation techniques, further evidence is still required.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Ku et al, 2021 41 recently examined condylar position change after mandibular setback OS across 4 different plates and did not discuss CR or shape changes, instead focusing on condylar position changes that showed after 12 months and the current study agrees with the results of Ku and colleagues, as well as Park et al, 42 who affirmed that we still need more evidence on CR related with different plating systems using 3-dimensional analysis after different OS and DO devices. Furthermore, these findings were recently reaffirmed by Nayansi et al, 2023, 43 who examined distinct plating results at just setback OS in class III patients and, therefore, for CR outcomes in class II patients, particularly those who underwent BSSO with different fixation techniques, further evidence is still required.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, SSRO, commonly used in the mandible, presents challenges for applying surgical guides compared to the maxilla, and the bone fracture pattern is more varied [ 21 , 34 , 35 ]. We conducted a clinical evaluation to assess the impact of a bespoke Snowman plate designed on the basis of sliding plate studies [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] on postoperative mandibular positioning. The study consisted of a control group using a bespoke four-hole plate and a study group using a bespoke Snowman plate with a sliding plate effect, with the aim of evaluating the stability of PSPs for up to 1 year after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion was necessary to compare groups with an equal number of screws. Snowman plates are customized; however, using three screws can result in an adjustable [ 68 ] or sliding plate effect [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] during surgery. The long-term success of orthognathic reconstructive surgery depends on the long-term stability of surgical correction [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CBCT data were extracted as a file of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). A 3-dimentional analysis program (OnDemand 3D, Cybermed, Seoul, Korea) was used to compare the preoperative planned location of the implant with the postoperative implant position by the automated registration software [ 20 ]. The software was superimposed on the basis of voxels’ gray level within the anterior cranial bases of the two CBCT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%