2010 International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccsa.2010.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Routing Protocol Performance in Wireless Mesh Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many previous studies such as [33][34][35][36] evaluated the performance of existing routing protocols in ad hoc and wireless mesh networks, few of them considered hybrid methods, especially for video streaming applications. A neural network-based hybrid scheme is introduced by Nenad [37] based on both proactive and reactive routing protocols and mobile agent technology which is controlled by a Hopfield neural network.…”
Section: Recent Proposed Hybrid Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many previous studies such as [33][34][35][36] evaluated the performance of existing routing protocols in ad hoc and wireless mesh networks, few of them considered hybrid methods, especially for video streaming applications. A neural network-based hybrid scheme is introduced by Nenad [37] based on both proactive and reactive routing protocols and mobile agent technology which is controlled by a Hopfield neural network.…”
Section: Recent Proposed Hybrid Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the information is stored by every node in a route cache instead of the routing table. [4] …”
Section: Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the topology-based routing protocols considered here, two distinct categories can be defined: 1) Proactive which maintain the information about the routes to every node all the time sending periodic updates even if the nodes do not communicate with each other, including DSDV(Destination-Sequenced-Distance Vector) and OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing,) [4] 2) Reactive called also 'on-demand' for which the paths are computed and maintained only when needed, including AODV (Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector), and DSR (Dynamic Source Routing). [4].…”
Section: Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La adopción de los protocolos de encaminamiento diseñados para redes ad hoc en iWMN ha generado dudas justificadas sobre su desempeño [35], y éstas han sido parcialmente contestadas a través de diversos trabajos de investigación. Sin embargo, existen parámetros de evaluación, escenarios de simulación y adecuaciones a los protocolos que no han sido atendidos en la literatura [41].…”
Section: Principales Diferencias Entre Redes Ad Hoc E Iwmnunclassified
“…Por ejemplo, los trabajos presentados por Zakrewska et. al [35,41] presentan un conjunto de parámetros de evaluación muy significativos, sin embargo el escenario de evaluación que utilizan no es representativo de una iWMN sino de una cWMN, en contraste, Gerla et. al presentan un escenario muy representativo de una hWMN pero el conjunto de parámetros de evaluación no es tan detallado como el propuesto por Zakrewska et.…”
Section: Estado Del Arteunclassified