2013
DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v5i8.1067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Risk using Value at Risk (VaR) After Crisis in 2008 Study in Stocks of Bank Mandiri, Bank BRI and Bank BNI in 2009-2011

Abstract: Value at Risk (VaR) is a tool to predict the greater loss less than the certain confidence level over a period of time. Value at Risk Historical Simulation produce reliable value of VaR because of the historical data and measure the skewness of the observe data. So, Value at Risk well used by investors to determine the risk to be faced on their investment. To calculate VAR it is better to use maximum likelihood, which has been considered for estimating from historical data and also available for estimating non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historical simulation provides the advantage of using actual historical data that reflects the actual state of the market and is easy for investors and management to understand. The study results prove that historical simulation accurately estimates bank risk in the 2009-2011 crisis (Fadhila & Rizal, 2013). Amin et al (2018) supported these results by proving that in the crisis period, the historical simulation method is a more accurate method than the standard delta method through the calculation of Mean Square Error (MSE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Historical simulation provides the advantage of using actual historical data that reflects the actual state of the market and is easy for investors and management to understand. The study results prove that historical simulation accurately estimates bank risk in the 2009-2011 crisis (Fadhila & Rizal, 2013). Amin et al (2018) supported these results by proving that in the crisis period, the historical simulation method is a more accurate method than the standard delta method through the calculation of Mean Square Error (MSE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…(2020) also supported the results by proving that the historical simulation method was the best and consistent method in estimating the VaR of single stocks and portfolios based on backtesting. Fadhila and Rizal (2013) proved the risk estimation (VaR) in the crisis period 2009-2011 on BRI and BNI bank stocks with a historical simulation approach provided accurate results. Another study on the evaluation of the performance of VaR in emerging stock markets conducted by Raghavan et al (2017) supported the results of this study by proving the historical simulation method was appropriate to use on the Russian and Indian stock markets during the crisis market.…”
Section: Accuracy Test Results (Backtesting) With Kupiec Testmentioning
confidence: 98%