2014
DOI: 10.37190/epe140407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of risk of failure in water main pipe network and of delivering poor quality water

Abstract: The method of identifying areas of risk of failure in water pipe network has been presented including presentation and analysis of risk factors for failure in water main pipe network, the proposal of the method for identifying risk areas using a simulation model of the water distribution subsystems (WDS) operation, and an example of application. In the hydraulic model, the failures of main water pipes as well as the operation of the WDS in the case of contamination were simulated. The proposed method consists … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where: P-point weight assigned to the probability of a water supply being lacking; C-point weight associated with the negative effects of a failure of water supply; S-point weight connected with the protection of a CWSS against lack of supply. As parameters P and C have already been described in publications relating to lack of water supply risk, they have been omitted from this article [65]. These are usually determined on a 5-point scale, with descriptions of-very small, small, medium, large, and very large, and weightings in the 1-5 range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: P-point weight assigned to the probability of a water supply being lacking; C-point weight associated with the negative effects of a failure of water supply; S-point weight connected with the protection of a CWSS against lack of supply. As parameters P and C have already been described in publications relating to lack of water supply risk, they have been omitted from this article [65]. These are usually determined on a 5-point scale, with descriptions of-very small, small, medium, large, and very large, and weightings in the 1-5 range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the transport of network water in the distribution system, both values of physiochemical composition indicators can change as well as the bacteriological quality [3,4,7]. Main causes of secondary contamination include lack of chemical and biological stability of water put into distribution, improperly conducted disinfection of water, and changeable hydraulic conditions occurring in the network (water flow rate, pressure) [1,9]. Lack of chemical stability leads to corrosiveness of the material (water aggressivity) or to sedimentation, mainly of calcium carbonate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical structure of the distribution system and basic information on water sources are generally well documented for most first-world metropolises. In these settings, water managers traditionally rely on network analyses to study different aspects of water distribution systems, including pressure gradients, flow rates, water losses from the supply system, identification of vulnerable sections, and tracking of disinfectants and contaminants (Boryczko and Tchórzewska-Cieślak, 2014;Pietrucha-Urbanik, 2015;Yoo et al, 2015). These analyses are generally robust; however, they are seldom validated using observational data and can suffer from shortcomings including the absence of unique solutions in underdetermined systems, assumption of invariant flow rates, uncomprehensive or non-inclusiveness of uncertainty in the analysis (Waldrip et al, 2016), and outdated and/or incorrect information on infrastructure (Liggett and Chen, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%