2016
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.12862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of residue conformations in peptides in Cambridge structural database and protein‐peptide structural complexes

Abstract: A comprehensive statistical analysis of the geometric parameters of peptide chains in a reduced dataset of protein-peptide complexes in Protein Data Bank (PDB) is presented. The angular variables describing the backbone conformations of amino acid residues in peptide chains shed insights into the conformational preferences of peptide residues interacting with protein partners. Nonparametric statistical approaches are employed to evaluate the interrelationships and associations in structural variables. Grouping… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(d) Comparison of Conformations in Different Environments. Raghavender compared the backbone conformations of amino acid residues in (a) small peptides bound to proteins in Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures and (b) unbound peptides in CSD structures . Aliphatic residues (Ala, Ile, Leu, and Val) occurred often enough in both to allow meaningful comparison and were found to show broadly similar geometric trends, but with the CSD residues being somewhat more conformationally variable.…”
Section: Fundamental Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) Comparison of Conformations in Different Environments. Raghavender compared the backbone conformations of amino acid residues in (a) small peptides bound to proteins in Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures and (b) unbound peptides in CSD structures . Aliphatic residues (Ala, Ile, Leu, and Val) occurred often enough in both to allow meaningful comparison and were found to show broadly similar geometric trends, but with the CSD residues being somewhat more conformationally variable.…”
Section: Fundamental Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polypeptide chains with less than or equal to 30 residues were treated as peptides in this analysis. The reason for using such a large value for peptide length definition is arbitrary and to an extent is based on our observation of synthetic peptides of length > 30 in both PDB and Cambridge Structural Database 43 . In addition, SLiMs are known to be short (3-10 amino acids) and >30 residues are treated as IDRs.…”
Section: Composition Of Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for using such a large value for peptide length definition is arbitrary and to an extent is based on our observation of synthetic peptides of length >30 in both PDB and Cambridge Structural Database. 48 In The structures were divided into three classes as protein− protein, protein-peptide and others. The third category of 20 structures consists of mostly monomeric and small molecule bound proteins, with one example of a peptide−peptide complex (2JO9) and one multiprotein-peptide complex (3VI4).…”
Section: Composition Of Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%