Analysis of Relevant Factors Affecting the Pregnancy Rate of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycle

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study is to explore the relevant factors affecting the pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. Methods. The clinical data of 931 patients who underwent artificial cycle preparation for endometrial FET from April 2017 to November 2020 in the reproductive center of our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results. According to the pregnancy situation, the patients were divided into 450 cases of pregnancy and 481 cases of biochemical pregnancy. The univariate analysis of FET biochemical pregnancy showed that there were statistically significant differences between pregnancy and biochemical pregnancy in terms of years of infertility, age, endometrial thickness, P level, E2/P, and the number of high-quality embryos ( P < 0.05 ). Multivariate analysis of pregnancy showed that age <30 years was a protective factor for biochemical pregnancy and endometrial thickness <8 mm and E2/P < 0.3 were risk factors ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. The regulation of endometrial thickness and E2/P serves as the key of treatment for patients undergoing FET using artificial cycle preparation for endometrial transfer, and it contributes to improve the pregnancy rate; also, the patient's age is an important indicator influencing the pregnancy rate.

Retracted: Analysis of Relevant Factors Affecting the Pregnancy Rate of Frozen‐Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycle

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”