1982
DOI: 10.2172/6673558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of recent Council on Economic Priorities newsletter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of this validation analysis, the following documents were examined for specific comments on the incident-free conceptual models used in RADTRAN: (Jefferson et al 1982) Transporting Spent Nuclear Fuel Allegations and Responses (Jefferson 1983) The Next Nuclear (Resnikoff 1990) A Comparison of MSKIND and RADTRAN 4 (Brumburgh and Alesso 1993) Based on these documents, six specific comments on the incident-free conceptual models used in RADTRAN were identified (some of these comments do not apply to the current version of RADTRAN, but do apply to previous versions of RADTRAN):…”
Section: Critiques Of Radtranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of this validation analysis, the following documents were examined for specific comments on the incident-free conceptual models used in RADTRAN: (Jefferson et al 1982) Transporting Spent Nuclear Fuel Allegations and Responses (Jefferson 1983) The Next Nuclear (Resnikoff 1990) A Comparison of MSKIND and RADTRAN 4 (Brumburgh and Alesso 1993) Based on these documents, six specific comments on the incident-free conceptual models used in RADTRAN were identified (some of these comments do not apply to the current version of RADTRAN, but do apply to previous versions of RADTRAN):…”
Section: Critiques Of Radtranmentioning
confidence: 99%