2018
DOI: 10.2172/1463259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Radiolytically Generated Gases in Mini-AMORE Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution experienced neutron/photon flux from the fissioning of LEU in the TSV and from the DU target that caused it to fission. This experiment is a continuation of similar experiments conducted in 2017 and 2018 in which 0.1 M sulfuric acid was present in the TSV [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The solution experienced neutron/photon flux from the fissioning of LEU in the TSV and from the DU target that caused it to fission. This experiment is a continuation of similar experiments conducted in 2017 and 2018 in which 0.1 M sulfuric acid was present in the TSV [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Table 3.9 compares the samples in this report with those run in 2017 and 2018. The table shows the date, sample type, fission per ng 235 U per LINAC beam energy (Fission/ng-235 U/kWh) and the presence or absence of LEU in the AMORE TSV for the three Fe 2+ spiked samples in this report and the un-spiked samples run in 2017 and 2018 [2]. This shows the effect that uranyl sulfate in the TSV has on fission power in the mini-AMORE solutions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fe 2+ Spiked To Un-spiked Uranyl Sulfate Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations