2006
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.075911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Puff Dynamics in Oocytes: Interdependence of Puff Amplitude and Interpuff Interval

Abstract: Puffs are localized Ca(2+) signals that arise in oocytes in response to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)). They are analogous to the sparks of myocytes and are believed to be the result of the liberation of Ca(2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum through the coordinated opening of IP(3) receptor/channels clustered at a functional release site. In this article, we analyze sequences of puffs that occur at the same site to help elucidate the mechanisms underlying puff dynamics. In particular, we show a dependenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
49
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A refractory period has been invoked to account for mutual annihilation of colliding intracellular Ca 2 þ waves (Lechleiter et al, 1991) and the periodicity of Ca 2 þ oscillations (Parker & Ivorra, 1990), but its molecular basis has remained unknown. The observed latency is in quantitative agreement with the mean refractory periods (B2.5 s) between two successive spontaneous InsP 3 Rmediated elementary Ca 2 þ release events (puffs) observed in the presence of saturating [InsP 3 ] (Fraiman et al, 2006). This result indicates that the latency for channel recovery from Ca 2 þ inhibition, rather than other mechanisms such as lingering high [Ca 2 þ ] i in the vicinity of the Ca 2 þ release sites after a Ca 2 þ release event, is responsible for the refractory behaviour of Ca 2 þ release sites observed in vivo (Ilyin & Parker, 1994).…”
Section: Channel Inhibition and Recovery Kineticssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A refractory period has been invoked to account for mutual annihilation of colliding intracellular Ca 2 þ waves (Lechleiter et al, 1991) and the periodicity of Ca 2 þ oscillations (Parker & Ivorra, 1990), but its molecular basis has remained unknown. The observed latency is in quantitative agreement with the mean refractory periods (B2.5 s) between two successive spontaneous InsP 3 Rmediated elementary Ca 2 þ release events (puffs) observed in the presence of saturating [InsP 3 ] (Fraiman et al, 2006). This result indicates that the latency for channel recovery from Ca 2 þ inhibition, rather than other mechanisms such as lingering high [Ca 2 þ ] i in the vicinity of the Ca 2 þ release sites after a Ca 2 þ release event, is responsible for the refractory behaviour of Ca 2 þ release sites observed in vivo (Ilyin & Parker, 1994).…”
Section: Channel Inhibition and Recovery Kineticssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…4D). This is unlikely to result in stochastic recovery of IP 3 R from an inactivated state induced by a preceding puff, because the mean size of the first puffs evoked by photo-released IP 3 is not appreciably greater than subsequent puffs (17), and puff amplitudes show only weak correlations with the amplitude of a preceding puff and with the inter-puff interval (31). Instead, we propose that the rapid cessation of channel openings results from an inhibitory process with kinetics comparable to the regenerative activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As done in [27], we assume that the number of channels that open during a puff is equal to the number of IP 3 R’s with IP 3 bound in the cluster and that they all open and close simultaneously (see Supplementary Section). In this way, the distribution of observed currents, f I (I) , depends on the probability that there are N p IP 3 R’s with IP 3 bound in a cluster, P(N p ) , and on the relationship between the current, I , and N p (the number of channels that open during a puff).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%