2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Public Testimony About Philadelphia's Sweetened Beverage Tax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies examined the political process of implementing FPs (almost entirely SSB taxes), finding that a key barrier to this process related to industry-promoted anti-tax arguments that they lead to economic harm, 28 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 62 , 63 , 67 , 80 , 82 such as unemployment or reduced sales revenues: concerns echoed by retailers. 70 Studies which examined the economic impact of SSB taxation, found a lack of RWE that taxes have a negative impact on employment within affected industries and in general, 74 , 78 or a negative impact on retailers who, in the US, supported implementation of nationwide SSB taxation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies examined the political process of implementing FPs (almost entirely SSB taxes), finding that a key barrier to this process related to industry-promoted anti-tax arguments that they lead to economic harm, 28 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 62 , 63 , 67 , 80 , 82 such as unemployment or reduced sales revenues: concerns echoed by retailers. 70 Studies which examined the economic impact of SSB taxation, found a lack of RWE that taxes have a negative impact on employment within affected industries and in general, 74 , 78 or a negative impact on retailers who, in the US, supported implementation of nationwide SSB taxation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many themes overlapped with those found in analyses of other SSB campaigns, including exploitation of local concerns by the ABA. 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 The 2018 vote to keep tax revenue for use by the Health Equity Fund passed by a larger margin than the original 2016 measure. Pro arguments in the 2018 campaign focused largely on community and funding benefits, which align with findings and recommendations from Berkeley and Philadelphia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pro arguments in the 2018 campaign focused largely on community and funding benefits, which align with findings and recommendations from Berkeley and Philadelphia. 8 , 17 The focus on community and funding benefits may have played a role in the high public support for the 2018 measure because public support has been observed to be higher when an SSB tax is framed as funding health and public programs rather than as a nutrition intervention or means to fill general funding gaps. 19 , 20 Overall, there were more pro-framed articles than anti-framed, but there was expressed skepticism from news staff about motivations behind the tax and the inclusion of affected communities, which may indicate the centering of public health advocates rather than affected community members in the campaign’ outward-facing aspects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing impact evaluations of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax have focused on postintervention experiences of retailers 22 and families of low income, 23 changes in purchasing [24][25][26][27][28] and consumption behaviors, 29,30 prices and product availability, [25][26][27]31 and employment. 32,33 Implementation evaluations have been conducted through interviews with those involved in the policymaking process, 34 analysis of public testimony provided to City Council, 35 and a review of the policy's development and enactment. 36 However, there is a lack in understanding of the public disclosure in which these changes occurred, notably public sentiments throughout the Philadelphia Beverage Tax's development and implementation, and the types of conversations related to the tax, which occurred during this time (including what entities were the main sources of information).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%