2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst layers for reduction of platinum loading at Nissan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
185
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
185
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see 54.245.55.244 Downloaded on 2018-05-11 to IP A critical and unresolved challenge in PEMFCs that has arisen with the attempts at reducing Pt loading and cost is the lower than projected peak power for cathodes incorporating ultra-low Pt loadings. The issue is being studied intensively and different groups 114,[121][122][123][124][125] have identified several possible routes including catalyst interaction with Nafion. In MEAs of PEMFCs, since it is not possible to carry out an investigation in the absence of ionomer (ionomer is indispensable for proton conduction), the contribution of the ionomer adsorption/blocking cannot be easily examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see 54.245.55.244 Downloaded on 2018-05-11 to IP A critical and unresolved challenge in PEMFCs that has arisen with the attempts at reducing Pt loading and cost is the lower than projected peak power for cathodes incorporating ultra-low Pt loadings. The issue is being studied intensively and different groups 114,[121][122][123][124][125] have identified several possible routes including catalyst interaction with Nafion. In MEAs of PEMFCs, since it is not possible to carry out an investigation in the absence of ionomer (ionomer is indispensable for proton conduction), the contribution of the ionomer adsorption/blocking cannot be easily examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…266,324 It was found that the resistance increased as Pt loading decreased. [132][133][134]264,266,325 The voltage-losses were found to scale with the Pt surface-area specific current density (as opposed to geometricarea specific current density) after correction for bulk (channels, DM, catalyst-layer length scale) transport losses by suitable models. 263 The local resistance is thus assumed to exist at or near the Pt surface to account for the unexplained higher voltage loss associated with lower Pt loading.…”
Section: Catalyst-layer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…157,327 With the lower water contents (and perhaps the existence of different morphology and confinement driving the lower water uptake), it is not surprising that the ion conductivity is likewise depressed, [327][328][329] and is a function of ionomer content. 326,327,330,331 However, it should be noted that some studies suggest similar proton conductivity in catalyst layers as in bulk, 332,333 which may be due to measurement methods or perhaps anisotropic conductivity; more data is required. Finally, it is important to realize that understanding ionomer thin-film behavior is key not only for PEFC catalyst layers, but also for the characterization of bulk membrane surfaces, where the near-interface regions could be interpreted as thin-films.…”
Section: Catalyst-layer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1] Regrettably already for loadings below 0.10 mg Pt /cm² at the cathode side, the performance suffers quite drastically due to a poorly understood local resistance, which is thought to be related to an increased local mass-transport resistance (MTR), although other causes have been proposed as well. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] In terms of physical interpretation, the MTR represents the local resistance of a reactant molecule towards reaching an active reaction site, which becomes more significant as the number of reaction sites decrease but the desired overall reaction rate remains the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%