The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200400879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of protein interactions on protein arrays by a wavelength interrogation‐based surface plasmon resonance biosensor

Abstract: We have investigated whether surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors based on the wavelength interrogation are able to analyze protein interactions on protein arrays. The spectral SPR sensor was self-constructed and its detection limit, expressed as the minimal refractive index variation, was calculated to be 6.6x10(-5) with the signal fluctuation of 1.0x10(-5). The protein array surface was modified by a mixed thiol monolayer to immobilize proteins. Protein arrays were analyzed by the line-scanning mode of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expression screenings in co-culture systems represent a useful method for the identification of novel families of synaptogenic molecules (Paradis et al, 2007; Linhoff et al, 2009). On a larger scale, existing proteomic methods, such as mass spectrometry and protein array tools, can be applied to reveal protein–protein interactions (Husi et al, 2000; Schweitzer et al, 2003; Yuk et al, 2004; Collins and Choudhary, 2008). Bioinformatics tools could also be employed to generate hypothesis of interactions that could be verified experimentally and to construct interaction maps and models that could be used to predict the effects of mutations of single proteins (Armstrong et al, 2006).…”
Section: A Molecular Catalog Of Inhibitory Synapsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression screenings in co-culture systems represent a useful method for the identification of novel families of synaptogenic molecules (Paradis et al, 2007; Linhoff et al, 2009). On a larger scale, existing proteomic methods, such as mass spectrometry and protein array tools, can be applied to reveal protein–protein interactions (Husi et al, 2000; Schweitzer et al, 2003; Yuk et al, 2004; Collins and Choudhary, 2008). Bioinformatics tools could also be employed to generate hypothesis of interactions that could be verified experimentally and to construct interaction maps and models that could be used to predict the effects of mutations of single proteins (Armstrong et al, 2006).…”
Section: A Molecular Catalog Of Inhibitory Synapsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gold arrays which have 50 spots (diameter of each spot: 2 mm) were fabricated and surfaces modified according to a previous report [24]. To fabricate a self-assembled monolayer, Au surfaces were modified with a mixed thiol solution of 1 mM 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid and 2 mM mercaptohexanol in ethanol for 16 h. For amine coupling between the carboxy group of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid and the amine groups of proteins, the carboxy group of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid was activated by treating the thiol-modified gold surfaces with a solution of 50 mM Nhydroxysuccinimide and 200 mM N-ethyl-N 0 -(dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide for 10 min.…”
Section: Preparation Of Protein Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, with the development of high-throughput techniques (such as microarrays) [12], angular SPR imaging sensors with multiple channels are developed based on twodimensional photoelectric conversion devices (such as CCD and CMOS cameras) [8][9][10]13]. Since the angular SPR sensors require monochromatic light sources, lasers are often chosen because of their excellent monochromaticity, nice parallelism, and high intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%