28th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, 2003. LCN '03. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/lcn.2003.1243129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of profitability of inter-system handovers between IEEE 802.11b and UMTS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the pa ram e ters used to de cide that a HO must take place cor re sponds to the Re ceived Sig nal Strength Inten sity (RSSI), but this is not enough to give pri or ity to a net work dur ing the HO pro ce dure; pa ram e ters like uti li za tion cost and avail able band width must also be con sid ered. There are other meth ods that can be used to make the HO de ci sion, like the one de scribed in (Matusz et al, 2003), where a HO de ci sion is based on the through put and a time hys ter esis (in the or der of sec onds) is con sid ered to avoid the ping-pong ef fect 1 ; how ever, the time they con sider to wait for a handoff is rel a tively high and they do not spec ify the ra dio channel en vi ron ment em ployed in their sim u la tions. In this work a met ric is used to trig ger the HO pro cedure; this met ric is based on four pa ram e ters from each net work: cost, band width, dis tance and RSSI (each of these pa ram e ters is as signed a dif fer ent weight).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the pa ram e ters used to de cide that a HO must take place cor re sponds to the Re ceived Sig nal Strength Inten sity (RSSI), but this is not enough to give pri or ity to a net work dur ing the HO pro ce dure; pa ram e ters like uti li za tion cost and avail able band width must also be con sid ered. There are other meth ods that can be used to make the HO de ci sion, like the one de scribed in (Matusz et al, 2003), where a HO de ci sion is based on the through put and a time hys ter esis (in the or der of sec onds) is con sid ered to avoid the ping-pong ef fect 1 ; how ever, the time they con sider to wait for a handoff is rel a tively high and they do not spec ify the ra dio channel en vi ron ment em ployed in their sim u la tions. In this work a met ric is used to trig ger the HO pro cedure; this met ric is based on four pa ram e ters from each net work: cost, band width, dis tance and RSSI (each of these pa ram e ters is as signed a dif fer ent weight).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one mainly consists of the Mobile IPv4 Registration process latency. During this period the MH is unable to send or receive any IPv4 packets [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%