2022
DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.1066722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Price Volatility in BIST 100 Index With Time Series: Comparison of Fbprophet and LSTM Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study found the ARIMA models to outperform the deep learning models with regard to predicting the considered price indexes. Aker (2022) likewise examined price volatility of the BIST-100 Index by comparing LSTM and Facebook Prophet (Fbprophet) methods and suggested the LSTM model to have outperformed the Fbprophet model based on the RMSE, mean absolute error (MAE), and mean squared error (MSE) evaluation metrics. Pakel and Özen (2021) also investigated a volatility analysis of the BIST-100 Index using GARCH models and identified two significant shocks in the BIST-100 (i.e., currency shock and COVID-19 pandemic shock) in 2018 and 2020, respectively.…”
Section: Empirical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study found the ARIMA models to outperform the deep learning models with regard to predicting the considered price indexes. Aker (2022) likewise examined price volatility of the BIST-100 Index by comparing LSTM and Facebook Prophet (Fbprophet) methods and suggested the LSTM model to have outperformed the Fbprophet model based on the RMSE, mean absolute error (MAE), and mean squared error (MSE) evaluation metrics. Pakel and Özen (2021) also investigated a volatility analysis of the BIST-100 Index using GARCH models and identified two significant shocks in the BIST-100 (i.e., currency shock and COVID-19 pandemic shock) in 2018 and 2020, respectively.…”
Section: Empirical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since commodities prices variations impact the life of millions of people globally, several techniques had been developed to forecast prices uctuation of these items with the application of machine learning being one of the most widespread methods of forecasting contemporaneously (Gumus & Kiran, 2017;Guo, 2019). The application of machine learning techniques had been widely used to predict prices of electricity (Yang et al, 2022), stock values (Kamalov et al, 2021;Aker, 2022), and even COVID-19 spread (Cha q et al, 2020; Gaur, 2020). Despite the utilization of machine learning has the potential to bring a wide-range of improvements to the cultivation of aquatic organisms by monitoring and predicting water quality parameters and feeding of the organisms (Yang et al, 2020), studies using this approach to predict seafood prices are scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%