2020
DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1817216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Prehospital Administration of Blood Products to Pediatric Casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their analysis of prehospital interventions in 3,439 children, Schauer et al 5 described intravenous fluid administration as one of the most frequent interventions, affecting 13.3% of studied patients. They found that 0.5% of children received prehospital blood products – a similar figure was reported by Lauby et al 38 likely reporting the same group of patients. Possible reasons for reported low levels of prehospital transfusion included inadequate availability of forward blood products, an absence of paediatric specific prehospital blood administration guidelines (if guidelines are available they are based on adult transfusion protocols) 38 and a lack of confidence among staff in their ability to administer prehospital blood products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In their analysis of prehospital interventions in 3,439 children, Schauer et al 5 described intravenous fluid administration as one of the most frequent interventions, affecting 13.3% of studied patients. They found that 0.5% of children received prehospital blood products – a similar figure was reported by Lauby et al 38 likely reporting the same group of patients. Possible reasons for reported low levels of prehospital transfusion included inadequate availability of forward blood products, an absence of paediatric specific prehospital blood administration guidelines (if guidelines are available they are based on adult transfusion protocols) 38 and a lack of confidence among staff in their ability to administer prehospital blood products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Titles and abstracts were screened leaving 145 records. Exclusion criteria were then applied to the remaining papers by reading the full text to identify 18 articles 3,5,12,16,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] to be used in the review. This process is described in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart below (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PRBC was the most frequently administered blood product for children registered in the DODTR between 2007 and 2016. For those arriving to the ED, Lauby et al 29 found that 33.8% were given PRBC prior to admission 20 . Warm fresh whole blood in children without severe brain injury was found to have an independent association with increased survival 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explosives were the predominant mechanism of injury among both groups. The composite injury severity score was 5 (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) in non-recipients and 16 (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) in recipients. Among the blood recipients, there was a higher proportion of serious injuries to all body regions.…”
Section: All Casualtiesmentioning
confidence: 99%