2017
DOI: 10.7166/28-1-1607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Policy Options for Projects in the Electricity Sector in Sub Saharan Africa: A System Dynamics Approach

Abstract: Many projects in the electricity energy sector in Africa's subSaharan region experience delays and challenges to quality, leading to frequent power outages that slow overall economic activity and frustrate investor confidence in the region. This paper presents the systemic methods employed to evaluate the dynamic consequences of policies in electricity energy sector projects in the region. The model uses the Vensim software to carry out the simulations. A range of illustrative scenarios are provided and analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that several studies have explored the dynamic of PM through SD models in different fields. These studies have been used for different purposes, as for instance, litigation (Cooper, 1980; Nasirzadeh et al, 2019; Williams et al, 2003), decision‐making process (Lopes et al, 2015; Sadabadi & Kama, 2014), development of policies (Lee et al, 2007; Mashayekhi, 2000; Ogano & Pretorius, 2017) and analysis of human resources in project delivery (Garcia‐Alvarez et al, 2016). In fact, the SD models consider relevant variables associated with the sustainability and innovation (Pargar & Kujala, 2021; Zhou & Liu, 2015), although studies of both have been developed separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that several studies have explored the dynamic of PM through SD models in different fields. These studies have been used for different purposes, as for instance, litigation (Cooper, 1980; Nasirzadeh et al, 2019; Williams et al, 2003), decision‐making process (Lopes et al, 2015; Sadabadi & Kama, 2014), development of policies (Lee et al, 2007; Mashayekhi, 2000; Ogano & Pretorius, 2017) and analysis of human resources in project delivery (Garcia‐Alvarez et al, 2016). In fact, the SD models consider relevant variables associated with the sustainability and innovation (Pargar & Kujala, 2021; Zhou & Liu, 2015), although studies of both have been developed separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modelling approach is a well-established technique (Sterman, 2000) characterised by non-linearities and feedback between the components in the model and is well suited to modelling complex socio-economic phenomena (Crookes et al, 2013). Its application in the energy field is substantial, with the focus on energy inputs through biodiesel (Musango et al, 2012), coal , invasive alien plants (Mudavanhu et al, 2016;Vundla et al, 2016; as well as labour inputs to the electricity sector (Ogano & Pretorius, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main characteristics of the method is nonlinear dependencies between parts of the model, feedback loops, time delays and modeling the system as a whole with time dynamics [13]. Method is used in a variety of disciplines [14], [15], [16], including human resources planning [17], [18].…”
Section: System Dynamic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%