2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of PMIPv6 extensions for identifying and assessing the efforts made for solving the issues in the PMIPv6 domain: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a mobility management solution with reduced signaling and delay to support an MN moving within an IPv6 domain, the IETF introduced PMIPv6. As a network-based mobility management protocol, PMIPv6 introduces two new network entities, a mobile access gateway (MAG) and a local mobility anchor (LMA) [43]. An LMA is connected to multiple MAGs, and in one PMIPv6 domain there can be multiple LMAs managing the mobility of a different group of MNs.…”
Section: ) Pmipv6 [40]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To provide a mobility management solution with reduced signaling and delay to support an MN moving within an IPv6 domain, the IETF introduced PMIPv6. As a network-based mobility management protocol, PMIPv6 introduces two new network entities, a mobile access gateway (MAG) and a local mobility anchor (LMA) [43]. An LMA is connected to multiple MAGs, and in one PMIPv6 domain there can be multiple LMAs managing the mobility of a different group of MNs.…”
Section: ) Pmipv6 [40]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that in FMIPv6 MAPs are designed as static network entities. 4) PMIPv6 in future LEO SatNets: In PMIPv6, the network performs the mobility management process on behalf of the MN, which reduces the signaling interaction between the MN and the network access router [43]. In [45], the author compared the performance of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 in a simple LEO constellation and the results showed reduced handover latency with the implementation of PMIPv6.…”
Section: B Limitations Of Ipv6 Location Management Standards In Futur...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When moving from MAP1 to MAP2. As a network-based mobility management protocol, PMIPv6 introduces two new network entities, Mobile Access Gateway (MAG) and Local Mobility Anchor (LMA) [39]. A LMA is connected to multiple MAGs and in one PMIPv6 domain, there can be multiple LMAs managing the mobility of a different group of MNs.…”
Section: Overview Of Ip-based Standardized Location Management and It...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, with the large scale of future LEO SatNets, HMIPv6 will be performing inter-MAPs handovers which generates a high number of control messages for location management and prolongs latency. d) PMIPv6: In PMIPv6 the network performs the mobility management process on behalf of the MN, which reduces the signaling interaction between the MN and the network access point [39]. In [41], the author compared the performance of MIPv6 and PMIPv6 in a simple LEO constellation and the results showed reduced handover latency with the implementation of PMIPv6.…”
Section: B Limitations Of Ipv6 Location Management Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems include handover latency, network mobility support, packet loss issue, load on resources, an un-optimized path for communication, and signaling required [2,3]. For addressing and solving the problems associated with PMIPv6, experts have provided various protocol extensions [4][5][6]. Among these extensions, predictive PMIPv6 extensions are much more effective in terms of handover latency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%