2015
DOI: 10.1017/s207863361400054x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of pig breeding management and trait preferences in smallholder production systems in Kenya

Abstract: SummaryData on breeding management, breed and trait preference for pigs were collected from smallholder farmers in Kiambu and Kakamega Counties of Kenya. The production systems evaluated were semi-intensive and extensive and depicted varying pig production intensities, production objectives, pig performances as well as farmers’ breed and trait preferences. The perception of the importance of traits was evaluated to obtain a more balanced objective view on production and/or breeding objectives. The data collect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other traits identified were growth rate and age at first mating, which were reported previously in South Africa and Kenya [ 20 , 44 ]. Similar to our FGD findings, preference for these traits was attributed to farmers’ desire to have pigs grow or multiply faster so they could sell and generate a higher income [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The other traits identified were growth rate and age at first mating, which were reported previously in South Africa and Kenya [ 20 , 44 ]. Similar to our FGD findings, preference for these traits was attributed to farmers’ desire to have pigs grow or multiply faster so they could sell and generate a higher income [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In the present study, the practice of pig manure recycling is rarely used in farmers’ practices. Similar conclusions were found in Mbuthia et al ( 2015 ) when they studied pig farming systems in Kenya and in Fanchone et al ( 2020 ) when they compared the diversity of agroecological practices in Martinique, whereas pig manure recycling was found to be frequently used in Vietnam (Huyen et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In our analysis, farmers with a low number of animals were considered because small LFS (such as family farms) represent the traditional practice in the Caribbean since the time of slavery and these practices remain in Guadeloupe, particularly in semi-urban and rural areas (Xandé 1999 ; Sainton et al 2012 ). Therefore, these LFS cannot be ignored due to their particular functions for household sustainability, as it was shown in some tropical regions (Mbuthia et al 2015 ; Gourdine et al 2018 ; Huyen et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches are an alternative to the formal economic weighting approach for situations with under-developed market channels or where animals have nonmonetary values (or both), and for situations with multiple production and marketing systems. Some participatory approaches used in deriving trait preferences in livestock systems in the literature are conjoint analysis (Tano et al, 2003), choice experiments (Scarpa et al, 2003;Byrne et al, 2012), weighted indices (Bett et al, 2009;Mbuthia et al, 2015), Wilcoxon signed rank (Gizaw et al, 2010) and AHP (Sae-Lim et al, 2012;Omasaki et al, 2016).…”
Section: Choice Of Criteria For Determination Of Trait Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%