2009
DOI: 10.15554/pcij.06012009.81.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of photographically measured crack development from shear tests on large bridge girders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This steep inclination angle of the flexure‐shear crack can be identified from the shear tests of RC continuous beams conducted by Kupfer and Baumann and Vaz Rodrigues . According to experimental studies conducted by Dowell and Auer and Sun et al , the steep shear cracks were also observed in the PSC beams subjected to large bending moment combined with shear force.…”
Section: Proposed Model – Dual Potential Capacity Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This steep inclination angle of the flexure‐shear crack can be identified from the shear tests of RC continuous beams conducted by Kupfer and Baumann and Vaz Rodrigues . According to experimental studies conducted by Dowell and Auer and Sun et al , the steep shear cracks were also observed in the PSC beams subjected to large bending moment combined with shear force.…”
Section: Proposed Model – Dual Potential Capacity Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…, in Kani 's tooth model and Reineck ' s mecha nical tooth model , the shear behaviour or shear failure of the RC beam was explained based on flexural‐shear cracking behaviour. As is well known, whereas the web shear strength of concrete members can be determined theoretically and rather easily, the flexural‐shear behavioural mechanism is a very complex and troublesome problem . At a certain load level, flexural cracks occur when the tensile stress induced by flexure exceeds the cracking strength of the concrete on the tension side of the section, where the flexural cracks cannot propagate into the compression zone above the neutral axis.…”
Section: Proposed Model – Dual Potential Capacity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A s and A v are the areas of the longitudinal and transverse reinforcements, respectively; f vy is the yield strength of the transverse reinforcement; b w is the web width; d s is the effective member depth; c is the neutral axis depth estimated from the flexural analysis; and u is the inclination angle of the critical shear crack that can be taken as 45°or 60°for the critical sections located at d s from the support or the loading points, respectively (Dowell and Auer, 2011;Lee et al, 2016;Reineck, 1991;Sun et al, 2009). The tensile stress of the longitudinal reinforcement in the cracked interface (f sx, max ) can be determined from a typical nonlinear moment-curvature analysis, and the tensile stress in the longitudinal reinforcement between the flexural cracks (f sx, min ) can be calculated from the bond-slip relationship between the longitudinal reinforcement and surrounding concrete.…”
Section: Respectively;mentioning
confidence: 99%