2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00138-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of phenoxy herbicides in bovine milk by means of liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction with a hollow-fiber membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While the former two derivatization/SPME methods [18,19], with low sensitivity and poor repeatability, can only be used as screening technique; the later one [20] possesses sufficient sensitivity and good repeatability for determining phenoxy acid herbicides in real wastewater and groundwater samples. Supported liquid membrane (SLM) extraction, both flat membrane based [21] and hollow fiber membrane based [22,23], were also used as an alternative sample preparation technique for the determination of phenoxy acid herbicides. These methods have the merits of high selectivity, low cost, negligible consumption of organic solvent, and are readily couplied with LC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the former two derivatization/SPME methods [18,19], with low sensitivity and poor repeatability, can only be used as screening technique; the later one [20] possesses sufficient sensitivity and good repeatability for determining phenoxy acid herbicides in real wastewater and groundwater samples. Supported liquid membrane (SLM) extraction, both flat membrane based [21] and hollow fiber membrane based [22,23], were also used as an alternative sample preparation technique for the determination of phenoxy acid herbicides. These methods have the merits of high selectivity, low cost, negligible consumption of organic solvent, and are readily couplied with LC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, four solvents (1-octanol, isooctane, n-hexane, and ethyl acetate) with different physical properties (Table 1) [22,23] were tested as impregnates. 1-Octanol was chosen as the organic solvent immobilized in the pores of the fiber wall since previous studies had proved its suitability for three-phase HF-LPME [24][25][26]. Taken from references [22,23] less volatile since its molecular mass and dimensional structure may have suited this version of the hollow fiber.…”
Section: Microextraction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the pH of DP should be adjusted to deprotonate the analytes and to suppress the solubility of analytes [14]. In recent years, HF-LPME by both two-phase [17][18][19][20] and three-phase mode [21][22][23][24][25] has been applied for various sample preparation procedures because of the major advantages such as high enrichment, clean-up and low solvent consumption. For the extraction of aromatic amines, Yazdi and Es'haghi reported the application of two-step hollow-fiber-based LLLPME [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%