2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of pathological and non-pathological human skeletal remains by FT-IR spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences have also been noted when using CI and C/P (see Table 18.2) to examine pathological and nonpathological human bone. The presence of tuberculosis and syphilitic lesions caused a decrease in CI (but an increase in C/P) values (Nagy et al, 2008; see Figure 18.1, where it can be seen that these values also overlap with those for low-temperature burnings). This is perhaps to be expected considering that both pathological conditions result in remodelling of the bone surface, but it does have implications for sampling bone material beyond the anatomical location discussed by Thompson et al (2011).…”
Section: Interpreting Heat-induced Crystallinity Changesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Differences have also been noted when using CI and C/P (see Table 18.2) to examine pathological and nonpathological human bone. The presence of tuberculosis and syphilitic lesions caused a decrease in CI (but an increase in C/P) values (Nagy et al, 2008; see Figure 18.1, where it can be seen that these values also overlap with those for low-temperature burnings). This is perhaps to be expected considering that both pathological conditions result in remodelling of the bone surface, but it does have implications for sampling bone material beyond the anatomical location discussed by Thompson et al (2011).…”
Section: Interpreting Heat-induced Crystallinity Changesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The third major consideration is that whilst some workers may debate the application of CI to heat-altered bone, perhaps the key issue with the CI is that, as Piga et al (2008b) note, it Heat-induced changes to the Crystallinity Index using the FTIR-KBr method (data compiled from King et al, 2011;Koon et al, 2003;Lebon et al, 2010;Munro et al, 2007;Nagy et al, 2008;Piga et al, 2008a;Pucéat et al, 2004;Schiegl et al, 2003;Schwarz et al, 2009;Sillen and Morris, 1996;Stiner et al 2001;Thompson et al, 2009). The boxes represent 95% ranges, whilst the lines represent the total range of values, horizontal bars are the means and circles/asterisks are outlier values.…”
Section: Interpreting Heat-induced Crystallinity Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretically, postdepositional phenomena result in increasing loss of the organic component [21,22], so it was expected that the more ancient archeological bones had a smaller preservation of CC in comparison to the more recent forensic bones [39]. That would explain why the spectrum of forensic bones had a much more intense band of the amide I (collagen).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CI values in modern unaltered bone typically lie around 2.50-3.25, but will increase as crystal structure becomes more ordered (Munro et al, 2007;Nagy et al, 2008;Nielsen-Marsh and Hedges, 1999;Shipman et al, 1984;Stiner et al, 2001;Trueman et al, 2008). The crystal structure of bone can be seen to alter very slowly towards a more ordered composition with an associated increase in overall crystal size following death (Bartsiokas and Middleton, 1992;Munro et al, 2007;Olsen et al, 2008;Surovell and Stiner, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%