Analysis of participant satisfaction in the Barcelona colorectal cancer screening programme: Positive evaluation of the community pharmacy

Burón, Andrea; Posso, Margarita; Sivilla, Judit; Grau, J. M.; Guayta, Rafael; Castells, Xavier; Castells, Antoni; Macià, Francesc

doi:10.1016/j.gastre.2017.03.008

Cited by 4 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The proportion of responders who were men and women varied between the studies. In general, the proportion of responders who were men was greater than women, except in one study, in which more women (54.5%) responded than men 35…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 79%

“…Half of the studies (n=3) were assigned a high score based on CASP quality assessment criteria, and thus considered of high scientific quality 29 34 35. The remainder (n=3) were scored as being of moderate quality, based on the follow-up for longitudinal studies and confounding factors criteria 30 31 33…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The pre-test experience included receiving the invitation letter to attend the colonoscopy procedure. As a result, the primary outcomes of this stage included: ‘satisfaction with the information material’ (n=2, 33%),31 35 ‘satisfaction with the test kit’ (instructions/ usage) (n=2, 33%),29 35 ‘satisfaction with communication of the risks and benefits of colonoscopy’ (n=3, 50%)29 31 34 and ‘anxiety and disturbance in daily activities and sleep’ (n=2, 33%)31 33 (table 2). The online supplemental table 3 provides a summary of the patient-reported experience pre-colonoscopy procedure.…”

Section: Outcome 1: Pre-test Experiencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Patients’ experience of using colonoscopy as a diagnostic test after a positive FOBT/FIT: a systematic review of the quantitative literature

Kayal,

Kerrison,

Hirst

et al. 2023

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesFaecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are among the most used screening modalities for colorectal cancer (CRC). Colonoscopy is also widely used as a screening and diagnostic test for adults with a positive FOBT/FIT. Patient experience of colonoscopy is an important component for most CRC screening programmes. Individuals with negative experiences are less likely to engage with colonoscopy in the future and can deter others from attending colonoscopy when invited. This review synthesised data on patient experience with colonoscopy, following a positive result, to provide insights into how to improve patient experience within the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched for quantitative questionnaire studies evaluating patient-reported experience with colonoscopy, following a positive screening FOB/FIT result. The search was limited to studies published between 2000 and 2021 (ie, when the first FOBT/FIT screening programmes for CRC were introduced). Data-driven and narrative summary techniques were used to summarise the literature.ResultsIn total, six studies from the UK (n=4), Spain (n=1) and the Netherlands (n=1) were included in the review (total participants: 152 329; response rate: 68.0–79.3%). Patient experiences were categorised into three ‘stages’: ‘pre-colonoscopy’, ‘during the test’ and ‘post-colonoscopy’. Overall, patients reported a positive experience in all six studies. Bowel preparation was the most frequently endorsed issue experienced pre-test (experienced by 10.0–41.0% of individuals, across all studies), pain and discomfort for during the test (experienced by 10.0–21.0% of participants) and abdominal pain and discomfort after the test (these were experienced by 14.8–22% of patients).ConclusionThis review highlighted that patient-reported experiences associated with colonoscopy were generally positive. To improve the colonoscopy experience, bowel screening centres should investigate means to: make bowel preparation more acceptable, make colonoscopy less painful and reduce post-colonoscopy symptoms.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 79%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Outcome 1: Pre-test Experiencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patients’ experience of using colonoscopy as a diagnostic test after a positive FOBT/FIT: a systematic review of the quantitative literature

Kayal,

Kerrison,

Hirst

et al. 2023

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…El estudio para analizar la satisfacción de los participantes en el programa de detección de cáncer colorrectal de Barcelona, evalúan positivamente el programa y apoyan la farmacia como punto de distribución y recolección de tarjetas de prueba de sangre oculta en heces (FOB) 18 . En España, hay una comprensión de las farmacias comunitarias como centro de salud, por su proximidad, accesibilidad, equilibrio territorial, conexión en red y confianza ciudadana, lo que puede complementar idóneamente los programas de prevención pri maria y secundaria, como en el caso de la infección por el VIH.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Coordinación entre servicios farmacéuticos para una farmacoterapia integrada: el caso de Cataluña

Costa

Goldbaum

Guayta-Escolies³

et al. 2017

Ciênc. saúde coletiva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Published studies on patient satisfaction with CRC screening have focused mainly on some specific aspects of the whole screening process: the screening test used, 30 the conducting of a colonoscopy 31 32 or the most initial part of the screening process (invitation to and conducting of a screening test). 33 However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study that has assessed patient experience, satisfaction and participation in shared decision-making during the whole CRC screening process, focusing particularly on the processes that follow a positive screening test result and that take place in hospitals.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient experience, satisfaction and shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening: protocol of the mixed-methods study CyDESA

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes can reduce incidence and mortality from this condition if adherence to them is high. As patient experience and satisfaction are key factors in determining adherence to screening programmes, they need to be measured. Furthermore, to promote highly patient-centred healthcare, the perception of patients regarding shared decision-making during CRC screening needs to be known. This study aims to assess the experience, satisfaction and participation in decision-making of participants in a CRC screening programme and of patients diagnosed with CRC through this programme in relation to the diagnostic and therapeutic processes of cancer.Methods and analysisThe CyDESA study is a mixed-methods study with a four phase sequential design. In phase 1, we will conduct a systematic review of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) for patient experience or satisfaction with CRC screening. In case no located PREM can be applied, in phase 2, we will develop a new PREM. We will use the Delphi methodology to reach consensus among experts and patients and will conduct a pilot test of the developed PREM. Phase 3 is a multicentric cross-sectional study based on self-reported questionnaires that will be conducted at three Spanish hospitals (n=843). The objective is to find out about the experience, satisfaction and participation in decision-making of participants in the CRC screening programme who have had a positive screening test result according to their final screening diagnosis: false positives, colorectal polyps or CRC. Phase 4 is a qualitative phenomenological study based on individual interviews. It will explore the experiences of participants in the CRC screening programme and of those diagnosed with CRC.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval by the Ethics Committees of Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Hospital de Sant Pau and Parc de Salut Mar. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.Trial registration numberNCT04610086.

show abstract

Analysis of participant satisfaction in the Barcelona colorectal cancer screening programme: Positive evaluation of the community pharmacy

Cited by 4 publications

References 28 publications

Patients’ experience of using colonoscopy as a diagnostic test after a positive FOBT/FIT: a systematic review of the quantitative literature

Patients’ experience of using colonoscopy as a diagnostic test after a positive FOBT/FIT: a systematic review of the quantitative literature

Coordinación entre servicios farmacéuticos para una farmacoterapia integrada: el caso de Cataluña

Patient experience, satisfaction and shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening: protocol of the mixed-methods study CyDESA

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About