2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11224-016-0809-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of P–O–C, P–S–C and P–O–P angles: a database survey completed with four new X-ray crystal structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C-O-P angles are 119.6 (2) (C12-O11-P1) and 122.8 (2) (C10-O12-P1) for molecule 1 and 119.9 (2) (C23-O22-P2) and 122.4 (2) (C25-O21-P2) for molecule 2. These values are similar to those reported in analogous structures with a similar P (Sabbaghi et al, 2016). Fig.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The C-O-P angles are 119.6 (2) (C12-O11-P1) and 122.8 (2) (C10-O12-P1) for molecule 1 and 119.9 (2) (C23-O22-P2) and 122.4 (2) (C25-O21-P2) for molecule 2. These values are similar to those reported in analogous structures with a similar P (Sabbaghi et al, 2016). Fig.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The P atom is bonded in a distorted tetrahedral P[S][O] 2 [N] environment, with the surrounding bond angles at the P atom ranging from 99.04 (13) (O11-P1-O12) to 117.29 (10) (O11-P1-S1) for molecule 1 and from 99.10 (12) (O22-P2-O21) to 116.85 (10) (O22-P2-S2) for molecule 2. The maximum and minimum bond angles at the P atom are similar to those reported for an analogous structure with a similar (Sabbaghi et al, 2016). The N atoms adopt a practically planar environment (sp 2 hybridization state), which is reflected in the bond-angle sums at the N atoms (P-N-C + C-N-H + H-N-P ' 360 ).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The P O, P-O and P-N bond lengths are within the ranges observed in analogous structures (Hamzehee et al, 2016). The P-N-C and P-O-C angles show a little more 's' character with respect to sp 2 hybridization, as has been reported previously by a Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) analysis and by quantum chemical calculations for analogous structures (Sabbaghi et al, 2016;Vahdani Alviri et al, 2018). At the P atom, the narrowest and widest bond angles correspond to O2-P1-O3 and O1-P1-O3, with the values in the structure (I) being typical at 93.09 7 Computer programs: CrystalClear-SM Expert (Rigaku, 2014), CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2015), SHELXT2014 (Sheldrick, 2015a), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Mercury (Macrae et al, 2008) and enCIFer (Allen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Description Of the Crystal Structuressupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the hydrogen bonds formed, the P O group has a better acceptor capability than the other acceptor groups that usually exist in the structures, typically C O (Vahdani Alviri et al, 2018), S O (Pourayoubi et al, 2011) and N O/N-O (Gholivand et al, 2009), and a much better capability than ISSN 2053ISSN -2296 # 2018 International Union of Crystallography acceptors such as P S (Cupertino et al, 1998), C S (Omrani et al, 2015) and OAr (Ar = aryl) (Sabbaghi et al, 2016) groups. Thus, the P O group usually dictates the hydrogen-bond pattern as the best hydrogen-bond acceptor in the molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%