16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference 2003
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-3989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of ``p''-Multigrid for Continuous and Discontinuous Finite Element Discretizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the 1D results shown in table 5, these results are all worse. This behavior also occurs when using p-multigrid to solve continuous spectral element formulations [9]. The explanation for this behavior that is usually given is that a high-order finite-element simulation corresponds to a discretization that is on a high aspect ratio mesh; the spacing of Gauss Legendre points near ξ = −1 or 1 goes like 1/p 2 as compared to 1/p if the spacing is uniform.…”
Section: D Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the 1D results shown in table 5, these results are all worse. This behavior also occurs when using p-multigrid to solve continuous spectral element formulations [9]. The explanation for this behavior that is usually given is that a high-order finite-element simulation corresponds to a discretization that is on a high aspect ratio mesh; the spacing of Gauss Legendre points near ξ = −1 or 1 goes like 1/p 2 as compared to 1/p if the spacing is uniform.…”
Section: D Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For discontinuous formulations, we have performed some analysis of p-multigrid for hyperbolic systems [9], but not for elliptic equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first time, a geometric multigrid method was used for the solution at p = 1. Two years later, Helenbrook et al [25] changed the name of the method to ' p-multigrid', but still used a geometric p sequence. This paper considered both a (non-adaptive) hp-FEM discretization of the Laplace equation in 2D, and Streamline-Upwind Petrov-Galerkin (SUPG) and discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of the convection equation.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7]12 Efforts to develop efficient implicit solvers for DG have included optimized relaxation schemes, 11 analysis of traditional geometric multigrid, 13 GMRES, [14][15][16] and P-multigrid. [17][18][19][20] Analysis of geometric multigrid indicates mesh that independent results are possible; however, the required restriction operators are complex and would be difficult to implement for general unstructured grids. A large effort in GMRES can be found in open literature; however the method incurs a large storage penalty, and none have achieved mesh independent convergence for high Reynolds number flows (or other highly stiff cases).…”
Section: 10mentioning
confidence: 99%