2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of OWA operators in decision making for modelling the majority concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been applied in neural networks, 35,36 data base systems, 36 and fuzzy logic controllers 37,38 . Besides, it has proved to be the one of the most prominent aggregation operators in decision making, 39,40 group decision making, 1,41 and MCDM approaches under uncertainty 16,42,43 .…”
Section: Owamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been applied in neural networks, 35,36 data base systems, 36 and fuzzy logic controllers 37,38 . Besides, it has proved to be the one of the most prominent aggregation operators in decision making, 39,40 group decision making, 1,41 and MCDM approaches under uncertainty 16,42,43 .…”
Section: Owamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to add the information in the evaluation process the OWA operator LAMA will be used, because this operator is adapted for computing with words and is able to synthesize linguistic information in decision making environments producing results with a semantics of majority [11,12,13].…”
Section: B the Linguistic Aggregation Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, IOWA α most produces a larger pull towards the values that support each other, driving the results in the direction of what the majority reflects. In terms of further work, we believe there are some avenues that could be pursued in the short-term: (a) Investigate other OWA operators that could potentially produce a better aggregation representing the semantic majority opinion and (b) Utilise the OWA measure of dispersion, which calculates the degree to which all aggregates are used in the resulting final aggregation [8].…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%