2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.91.062312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of optimal unambiguous discrimination of three pure quantum states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Conjecture 1, convex set C contains a line segment α i = 0, since there exists a case where Bob discriminates unambiguously remaining quantum states except i -th pure state. For N = 3, the geometric argument can be found in refs 31 33 . Let us assume that Bob’s set of post-measurement states, which corresponds to conclusive result of Bob, is .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Conjecture 1, convex set C contains a line segment α i = 0, since there exists a case where Bob discriminates unambiguously remaining quantum states except i -th pure state. For N = 3, the geometric argument can be found in refs 31 33 . Let us assume that Bob’s set of post-measurement states, which corresponds to conclusive result of Bob, is .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that Alice prepares a quantum state out of two(or three) pure quantum states 6 9 , 31 33 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From these, we findP opt cor (q) = (1 + l)/2(∀q ≤ q (29). The optimal POVM of q 0 = χ is unique since r opt i = 0(∀i) and {q i v i } 2 i=0 forms a triangle; see the Appendix D. This means that P I (χ) = 0.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma Ii2 Assume That When {Qmentioning
confidence: 99%