2013
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.120611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Occlusal Stresses Transmitted to the Inferior Alveolar Nerve by Multiple Threaded Implants

Abstract: This study suggests a minimal implant-canal distance of 1 mm to prevent inferior alveolar nerve damage caused by three connected implants. For clinical safety, an additional 0.5 mm is recommended as a cushion, so a 1.5-mm minimal distance should be planned to avoid potential nerve injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a certain rate of risk can be observed also when the distance is higher. Infact, physical, toxic, ischemic, inflammatory processes, act as principal factor or co-factor in developing of peripheral neuropathy ( 20 - 21 ). In particular, the laceration of vasa vasorum or compression of nerve fibres due to the force applied during extraction or to the postsurgical edema, can elicit a neuropraxia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a certain rate of risk can be observed also when the distance is higher. Infact, physical, toxic, ischemic, inflammatory processes, act as principal factor or co-factor in developing of peripheral neuropathy ( 20 - 21 ). In particular, the laceration of vasa vasorum or compression of nerve fibres due to the force applied during extraction or to the postsurgical edema, can elicit a neuropraxia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk increases dramatically when there is a contact between an impacted molar and the mandibular canal [26,27]. Sammartino et al [28] proposed a safety distance from the mandibular canal of 1.5 mm during implant placement to avoid indirect lesions of the IAN. Consequently, a cut-off of 1.5 mm was chosen in our classification as a safety distance to differentiate the cases with higher risk of lesion (distance <1.5 mm) from those with a lesser one (distance >1.5 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid these complications it is necessary to perform a careful radiographic evaluation of mandibular anatomy. In the posterior region of the mandible attention should be paid to evaluate the distance to the inferior alveolar nerve in order to avoid neurosensory disturbance [17] as well as the angulation of implant placement to prevent the lingual cortical perforation and consequently the damage to the arteries of the mouth floor, mainly the mylohyoid artery [18]. In order to obtain an optimal implant primary stability, during split crest technique, it is necessary to place the implant apical to the osteotomic vertical lines, so greater attention needs to be paid to these structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%