2011
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0b013e3182354d68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Nonmodifiable Risk Factors for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture in a Large, Retrospective Cohort

Abstract: An AR >1.6, dome diameter >10 mm, a deviated neck, and right-sidedness are independently associated with aneurysm rupture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Additionally, the critical AR for rupture has varied among previous studies, with AR cutoff values ranging from 1.3 to 1.8, and remains controversial. 6,19,22,23,26 In our study, an AR of Ն1.6 was significantly associated with aneurysm rupture.…”
Section: Irregular Wall and Ar Of Symmetric Bilateral Aneurysms Predisupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Additionally, the critical AR for rupture has varied among previous studies, with AR cutoff values ranging from 1.3 to 1.8, and remains controversial. 6,19,22,23,26 In our study, an AR of Ն1.6 was significantly associated with aneurysm rupture.…”
Section: Irregular Wall and Ar Of Symmetric Bilateral Aneurysms Predisupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Previous studies on AR indicated conflicting results, finding a significant difference between the ruptured and unruptured groups, proving that AR is a relevant predictor in estimating the aneurysm rupture risk. 6,19,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The conflicting results can be explained by the lack of adjustment for patient-specific risk factors for aneurysm rupture and by the use of different imaging techniques and measurement methodology. 22,27 Regarding AR, only 3 previous studies aimed to minimize the confounding factors by studying patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms.…”
Section: Irregular Wall and Ar Of Symmetric Bilateral Aneurysms Predimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,11 Implementation of additional (aneurysm-related) risk factors for aneurysm rupture, such as aspect ratio (aneurysm neck-to-dome length/neckwidth), [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] size ratio (maximum aneurysm diameter/average vessel diameter), [29][30][31] and irregular aneurysm shape, 13,[32][33][34][35][36] might improve current rupture risk assessment. However, assessment whether implementation of additional risk factors improves risk prediction has several difficulties, such as the need of large numbers of patients-years as a result of an annual rupture rate of ≈1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,18,25 Regarding aspect ratio, most but not all previous studies showed that mean aspect ratios were higher in ruptured aneurysms than in unruptured aneurysms. 10,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][29][30][31] The conflicting results in case-control studies comparing geometric and morphological aneurysm characteristics between patients with ruptured aneurysms and patients with unruptured aneurysms can be explained by the lack of adjustment for patient specific risk factors for aneurysm rupture and by the use of different imaging techniques and measurement methodology. 15 Similar to our study, 2 previous studies aimed to minimize the risk of confounding by patient-specific characteristics by studying patients with aneurysmal SAH and multiple intracranial aneurysms, and demonstrated that a high aspect ratio was associated with aneurysm rupture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%