2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10043-019-00574-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of non-iterative phase retrieval based on machine learning

Abstract: In this paper, we analyze a machine-learning-based non-iterative phase retrieval method. Phase retrieval and its applications have been attractive research topics in optics and photonics, for example, in biomedical imaging, astronomical imaging, and so on. Most conventional phase retrieval methods have used iterative processes to recover phase information; however, the calculation speed and convergence with these methods are serious issues in real-time monitoring applications. Machinelearning-based methods are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We thereby never explicitly retrieve the phase. Since the execution time of a trained neural network is deterministic, this solution may be preferable over the aforementioned iterative solutions, an aspect that has been further studied in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We thereby never explicitly retrieve the phase. Since the execution time of a trained neural network is deterministic, this solution may be preferable over the aforementioned iterative solutions, an aspect that has been further studied in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of deep learning has been studied in the field of phase retrieval, e.g. [12], [13], [14], and [15], it has to our knowledge not been applied in this context of non-coherent radar, and unlike most other such studies we use a DNN as a direct magnitude-to-magnitude transformation, and do not recover the phase. These two solutions are only equivalent when the phase reconstruction is perfect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Non-iterative methods with a learned component: Non-iterative phase retrieval with a deep convolutional neural network that is trained end-to-end is proposed by Nishizaki et al [16]. Recently, Tayal et al [13] use symmetry breaking to solve the oversampled phase retrieval problem with neural networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we empirically evaluate the performance of our model. In order to do this, we report the results of the fully-convolutional residual network (ResNet) employed by Nishizaki et al [16], the multi-layer-perceptron (MLP) used in [21] and the PRCGAN [21]. In addition to these learned networks we include the results of the well-established HIO algorithm [4] and the RAAR algorithm [12] as a baseline.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, there are several works that have set out to solve phase retrieval in imaging. See, for example, [25,26]. It is worth mentioning that Xu et al proposed deep learning methods for inversion of the electromagnetic inverse scattering problem without phase information in [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%