2019
DOI: 10.3102/0013189x19837220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Nominally Equivalent Outcome Studies: A Comment on Rickles, Heppen, Allensworth, Sorensen, and Walters (2018)

Abstract: Rickles, Heppen, Allensworth, Sorensen, and Walters (2018) compare two credit recovery programs with a null hypothesis of equal effects. Upon failing to reject the null, they implicitly accept the null. However, not rejecting the null is not equivalent to accepting the null, a confusion common to a range of research, which I highlight.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. We do not provide statistical tests for differences in rater agreement because power for such tests would likely be low so the likely result of "no difference" would be misleading (see White, 2019).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. We do not provide statistical tests for differences in rater agreement because power for such tests would likely be low so the likely result of "no difference" would be misleading (see White, 2019).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%