2014
DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2014.976541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of New Zealand primary and secondary student peer- and self-assessment comments: applying Hattie and Timperley’s feedback model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pedagogical implication of the findings seems straightforward. Since learning process-oriented feedback consistently pitched at the deep learning level will allow the learner to progress toward achieving more complex learning goals (Harris et al, 2015), we expect that conditions need to be created to allow for connection of students' preference for process-oriented feedback to action to maximize the pivotal role that students play in the classroom and learning process. While the potential discrepancy between preference for process-oriented feedback and its conversion to action among Chinese university EFL students documented in this study is undoubtedly worth further investigation, professional development is needed to equip EFL teachers with theory about and experience of highquality feedback to raise their awareness of the feedback practices that involve students in giving themselves and each other feedback that supports a deep understanding of learning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pedagogical implication of the findings seems straightforward. Since learning process-oriented feedback consistently pitched at the deep learning level will allow the learner to progress toward achieving more complex learning goals (Harris et al, 2015), we expect that conditions need to be created to allow for connection of students' preference for process-oriented feedback to action to maximize the pivotal role that students play in the classroom and learning process. While the potential discrepancy between preference for process-oriented feedback and its conversion to action among Chinese university EFL students documented in this study is undoubtedly worth further investigation, professional development is needed to equip EFL teachers with theory about and experience of highquality feedback to raise their awareness of the feedback practices that involve students in giving themselves and each other feedback that supports a deep understanding of learning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback to the self-level, most commonly associated with praise, was not included in this study due to evidence that it has a detrimental impact on learning (Dweck, 2007;Hattie, 2009a;Kluger & DeNisi, 1996). Harris, Brown, and Harnett (2015) used Hattie and Timperley's (2007) feedback model as a conceptual framework to investigate which level feedback was directed to during peer and self-assessment. The researchers reported that most feedback was directed to the task level and that self-regulatory feedback only featured in self-assessment.…”
Section: A Model Of Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internationally, studies involving both levels of education, showed that self-assessment enhances self-regulation (Harris et al, 2015), whereas self-assessment through the long-term use of a rubric can have a positive impact mainly on girls' self-efficacy .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%