1990
DOI: 10.1107/s0108767389013000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of neutron diffraction data in the case of high-scattering cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] for the He-Xe inwhere y, rn, and A are smooth functions of Q, calculated following Ref. [8] and reported in Table I for some selected Q values. As far as the neutron-beam profile impinging on the sample is concerned, it has been found to be quite well represented by a Gaussian shape.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] for the He-Xe inwhere y, rn, and A are smooth functions of Q, calculated following Ref. [8] and reported in Table I for some selected Q values. As far as the neutron-beam profile impinging on the sample is concerned, it has been found to be quite well represented by a Gaussian shape.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functions ? :(Q), m~(Q) and A:(Q) occurring in the previous analysis have been calculated using a program [25] that generalizes [22] to the case of a nonhomogeneous scatterer (cryostat, cell and sample). We evaluate numerically all the different single-and double-scattered intensities, and from them we obtain y:(Q) and m:(Q) [21].…”
Section: {I-ic5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To derive the appropriate scattering from the sample, it is necessary to subtract the multiple scattering contribution. The multiple scattering contribution is obtained using an appropriate simulation procedure 22 which is used also to determine the appropriate sample transmission T s . The final results for the coherent intensity, measured at two temperatures just below and just above the glass transition temperature, were found to be temperature independent within the experimental errors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%