2008
DOI: 10.1021/ci800302g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Neighborhood Behavior in Lead Optimization and Array Design

Abstract: Neighborhood behavior describes the extent to which small structural changes defined by a molecular descriptor are likely to lead to small property changes. This study evaluates two methods for the quantification of neighborhood behavior: the optimal diagonal method of Patterson et al. and the optimality criterion method of Horvath and Jeandenans. The methods are evaluated using twelve different types of fingerprint (both 2D and 3D) with screening data derived from several lead optimization projects at GlaxoSm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has recently [1] been pointed out that these indices may yield results that are more intuitive to a chemist's expectation of virtual screening quality than other, more artificial NB scoring schemes, and that a related index (the Cohen j statistics [33], unknown to us when designing X) had already been used in cognitive sciences. • It allows for an unambiguous definition of the optimal dissimilarity radius, reflecting the relative importance of FS versus PFD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has recently [1] been pointed out that these indices may yield results that are more intuitive to a chemist's expectation of virtual screening quality than other, more artificial NB scoring schemes, and that a related index (the Cohen j statistics [33], unknown to us when designing X) had already been used in cognitive sciences. • It allows for an unambiguous definition of the optimal dissimilarity radius, reflecting the relative importance of FS versus PFD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global optimality criterion [1,3] was estimated on the basis of all the compound pairs m,M in the data set (excluding the ones in which both m and M were inactives), and plotted with respect to the dissimilarity cutoff d in order to determine the optimal dissimilarity radius d* minimizing X(d*). Alternatively, the ''local'' NB monitoring scheme advocated here consists in estimating, for each active molecule M, its local optimality score X L (d*) specifically over the N-1 pairs excluding the monitored active M-later on referred to as the virtual screening ''query''.…”
Section: Qsar Model Of Tryptase Affinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[52] Similar "hits" are selected at the dissimilarity cut-off maximising the Local Ascertained Optimality Score (LAOS), a "noise-free" variant, [42] focusing on individual active queries, of the neighbourhood behaviour optimality score. [9,11,50] It is characteristic of the considered chemical space (defined as a combination of descriptors and dissimilarity calculation rule, or metric), within the specific context (given query compound, considered target) of the virtual screening experiments. For each reported active of every considered target, similarity-based retrieval of active analogues is performed within every considered descriptor space (i.e.…”
Section: Neighbourhood Behaviour (Nb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Standard methods include quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) [5][6][7][8] and similarity-based virtual screening. [9][10][11][12] However, although an enormous amount of descriptors [13][14][15][16] are available and data mining [17][18][19] methods are implemented for chemoinformatics tasks, significant differences of activity still arise among molecules perceived as similar by the computational tool (activity cliffs). [20,21] Activity cliffs, apparently violating the similarity principle "similar molecules are likely to have similar properties", are a complex problem, and it is not straightforward to distinguish the "genuine" situations from the cases related to an inappropriate chemical space and activity landscape definition (inappropriate molecular representation, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%