2020
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Neat Biofluids Obtained During Cardiac Surgery Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: Methodological Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, similar sizes of lipoproteins could confound the results of EVs quantification. It is suggested that the user strictly follow the protocols and report data accurately [ 96 ].…”
Section: Methods Of Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, similar sizes of lipoproteins could confound the results of EVs quantification. It is suggested that the user strictly follow the protocols and report data accurately [ 96 ].…”
Section: Methods Of Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DMEM cell culture medium is a highly complex matrix that strongly scatters laser light, which can interfere with the scattered light from the particles [ 22 , 26 ]. A full separation of the PS100 beads from proteins in the sample by a precedent EAF4 purification step is a viable way to reduce the interfering protein background leading to individual PS100 particle fractions that are much better amenable to NTA analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, both FFF and NTA have significantly grown in popularity for the analysis of complex biological samples including extracellular vesicles such as exosomes [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], and liposomes [ 4 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. It was therefore just a matter of time until both technologies were coupled in order to combine the advantages of both worlds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NTA apparatus NanoSight NS300 (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK), with NTA software version 3.2 (Malvern Instruments), was employed to characterize the size and concentration of the sEVs isolated from the pericyte CM. 53 For the analyses, sEVs were diluted 5 times in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS). Then, each sample was filtered using 0.22 μm Millex syringe filter unit (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and injected into the flow cell of the NanoSight NS300.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%