Introduction
Del Nido cardioplegia was reported to provide adequate myocardial protection
and clinical outcomes with improved surgical flow in adult cardiac surgical
procedures. And many clinicians have already modified the traditional
formula. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of tepid
modified del Nido cardioplegia compared to cold blood cardioplegia in adult
patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Methods
This retrospective study included one hundred consecutive adult patients
undergoing cardiac surgical procedures using tepid modified del Nido
cardioplegia. One hundred consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac
surgical procedures with cold blood cardioplegia were the control group.
Propensity score matching yielded 89 modified del Nido and 89 cold blood
cardioplegia patients.
Results
There were no significant differences when comparing the two matched groups
regarding the requirement for intraoperative defibrillation
(
P
=0.36), postoperative peak troponin T levels (0.18),
perioperative inotropic support (
P
=0.26), intra-aortic
balloon pump requirement (
P
=0.62), and postoperative left
ventricular ejection fraction at discharge (
P
=0.4) and on
the sixth postoperative month (
P
=0.37). Mean cross-clamping
time (
P
=0.005), cardiopulmonary bypass time
(
P
=0.03), and total operation time
(
P
=0.03) were significantly shorter in the del Nido
group.
Conclusion
Tepid modified del Nido cardioplegia may be a safe alternative to cold blood
cardioplegia in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures.