2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59424-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Multiple Classifiers Performance for Discretized Data in Authorship Attribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is rarely used in authorship authentication problems. Content-specific and language-specific are noted manually based on the topic and characteristics of language [ 28 ].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is rarely used in authorship authentication problems. Content-specific and language-specific are noted manually based on the topic and characteristics of language [ 28 ].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this step is to extract ''writing style'' features, which are internal characteristics of the text. Surveying authorship attribution studies, these features can be categorized into lexical, character, syntactic, semantic, content-specific, structural and languagespecific [16], [35], [47].…”
Section: ) Authorship Attribution Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this paper aims to bridge the gap and investigates whether applying the ensemble methods lead to improve the accuracy of the AA task in the Arabic language, in addition to selecting the base classifier for ensemble methods and optimal combination of features. Furthermore, since appropriate tuning of the size of the training set and feature data set can render significantly lighter the machine-learning processing [17], [47], this paper gives some recommendations for selecting the optimal settings of data set size that maximizes the accuracy of classifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can specify averages, frequencies of occurrence [44], or distributions of selected elements [45], which explains their inherent continuous nature. Inside this group, character features are distinguished, which refer to single characters (letters and digits) or their groups, of either fixed or varied length (but not necessarily forming words [46]). When synonyms and semantic dependencies are studied, with considerations of parts of speech, the resulting style markers can be treated as lexical, placed among syntactic descriptors, or form a separate category of semantic markers.…”
Section: Stylometric Characteristic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%