2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.05517
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Multipartite Entanglement Distribution using a Central Quantum-Network Node

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the distance in an Erdős-Rényi network grows logarithmically with the network size, or even sub-logarithmically, as a consequence of the smallworld effect [31]. Substituting in (8), one obtains a more detailed upper-bound:…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the distance in an Erdős-Rényi network grows logarithmically with the network size, or even sub-logarithmically, as a consequence of the smallworld effect [31]. Substituting in (8), one obtains a more detailed upper-bound:…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take full advantage of these technologies the next natural step is to have a quantum network capable of distributing entanglement between any two quantum terminals, or even more demanding, between multiple parties at the same time, called multipartite entanglement, and sometimes seen as a form of quantum multicast [6]. The work in [7] considers multipartite entanglement assuming no existence of quantum memories, while [8] assumes they exist at the nodes. Quantum networks should connect multiple quantum computers in order to scale up quantum computing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, doing so is compatible with our methodology, still providing a guarantee of optimality. This same methodology could then be applied to different models of networks, for example having some nodes capable of distributing multipartite entanglement [51], or different distribution schemes [52], introducing entanglement purification rounds in the bipartite distribution scheme [33], or even different quantum repeater protocols [53], providing a starting point to optimally generate multipartite entanglement over noisy quantum networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entanglement swapping is employed in nodes in the EPR chains to establish long-haul EPR pairs between the central node and the terminals. Thereafter, through local adjustments of these long-haul EPR pair connections, the central node can effectively transmit its multipartite entangled state to the remote clients [14,15]. This central node approach is schematized in figure 4.…”
Section: Other Models For Multipartite Entanglement Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these protocols involve the initial distribution of Bell pair states, followed by local operations at repeater nodes. This process ultimately establishes connections between clients and a central node for teleporting the desired graph state, as elaborated in [14] and [15]. In today's quantum networks, repeater nodes typically perform a single function: forwarding or swapping bipartite entanglement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%